ECIP: Difference between revisions

From CCMDB Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (m)
mNo edit summary
Line 16: Line 16:
:Now that we have the ERP Reports, we can find things like this however, we need to discuss if value to ICU database to include.  I know everyone is interested in patient flow and I was previously told that there is not that much delay when ICU attending accept patient, then when they are transferred to ICU. But there are a number we have seeing that sit it ER under ICU attending in one center then go from that ER to another site ICU.
:Now that we have the ERP Reports, we can find things like this however, we need to discuss if value to ICU database to include.  I know everyone is interested in patient flow and I was previously told that there is not that much delay when ICU attending accept patient, then when they are transferred to ICU. But there are a number we have seeing that sit it ER under ICU attending in one center then go from that ER to another site ICU.


:Also have ICU pt in ER under attending for 8 hrs, then they are transferred to continuing care at HSC.  Not sure what continuing care is.  Perhaps this is the HSC Community and Clinical Decision Unit (CCDU) / [[CAU]]?
:Also have ICU pt in ER under attending for 8 hrs, then they are transferred to continuing care at HSC.  Not sure what continuing care is.  Perhaps this is the [[HSC CAU]]?
*At HSC, the [[CAU]] is under emergency medicine service.  No patient are ever under internal medicine service in this area.  This is not an inpatient location as confirmed by [[p:Con Marks]], [[p:Louise Lemoine]].  This model of care will probably change.  [[User:TOstryzniuk|Trish Ostryzniuk]] 17:44, 2017 September 29 (CDT)
*The [[HSC_CAU]] is under emergency medicine service.  No patient are ever under internal medicine service in this area.  This is not an inpatient location as confirmed by [[p:Con Marks]], [[p:Louise Lemoine]].  This model of care will probably change.  [[User:TOstryzniuk|Trish Ostryzniuk]] 17:44, 2017 September 29 (CDT)






[[Category:EMIP]]
[[Category:EMIP]]

Revision as of 20:29, 2017 November 2

Not currently being collected


Emergency Critical Care InPatient.

We keep discussing whether EMIP like patients should be collected in Critical Care. Consensus is that they are rare, but for consistency it would be good if we caught them.

Template:Discuss@task

Email from Trish 2016-11-10:

Main office should take this to TASK meeting. ICU patient entire LOS in ER before being sent to another ICU at another site or to another Physician Service.
I know we are all keen are having data to see what patient flow is and if there are ICU patient under ICU attending but they stay in ER before they go to another ICU because not bed in own ICU or other reasons, then should we capture these? Really not physically in own ICU, but is in ER occupying bed under an ICU attending?
Now that we have the ERP Reports, we can find things like this however, we need to discuss if value to ICU database to include. I know everyone is interested in patient flow and I was previously told that there is not that much delay when ICU attending accept patient, then when they are transferred to ICU. But there are a number we have seeing that sit it ER under ICU attending in one center then go from that ER to another site ICU.
Also have ICU pt in ER under attending for 8 hrs, then they are transferred to continuing care at HSC. Not sure what continuing care is. Perhaps this is the HSC CAU?
  • The HSC_CAU is under emergency medicine service. No patient are ever under internal medicine service in this area. This is not an inpatient location as confirmed by p:Con Marks, p:Louise Lemoine. This model of care will probably change. Trish Ostryzniuk 17:44, 2017 September 29 (CDT)