High dose chemotherapy as primary admit: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DX tag | Other Medical | |High Dose Chemotherapy-as primary admit|HIGH DOSE CHEMOTHERAPY-as primary admit|86900 - High Dose Chemotherapy-as primary admit|||||Sep 27 2004}} | {{DX tag | Other Medical | | High Dose Chemotherapy-as primary admit|HIGH DOSE CHEMOTHERAPY-as primary admit|86900 - High Dose Chemotherapy-as primary admit|||||Sep 27 2004}} | ||
'''High Dose Chemotherapy-as primary admit''' should be coded only if it is the '''[[Primary Admit Diagnosis]]'''. | '''High Dose Chemotherapy-as primary admit''' should be coded only if it is the '''[[Primary Admit Diagnosis]]'''. | ||
| Line 5: | Line 6: | ||
{{Discuss | who = | {{Discuss | who = Trish | question = | ||
This page is listed as an exception in [[Definition of a Medicine Service admission]] so I wanted to make sure we include that instruction with the new codes. However, what _is_ the new code for this? Found nothing suitable in [[CCI Picklist]], [[CCI component 2 codes - what was done]], and [[ICD10 Diagnosis List]] only has [[Antineoplastic/chemotherapy or immunosuppressive drugs, adverse effect]] which doesn't seem a real match either. In general we would only code the cancer now, right, but this is a bit of a special case, so do we want to treat it separately? | This page is listed as an exception in [[Definition of a Medicine Service admission]] so I wanted to make sure we include that instruction with the new codes. However, what _is_ the new code for this? Found nothing suitable in [[CCI Picklist]], [[CCI component 2 codes - what was done]], and [[ICD10 Diagnosis List]] only has [[Antineoplastic/chemotherapy or immunosuppressive drugs, adverse effect]] which doesn't seem a real match either. In general we would only code the cancer now, right, but this is a bit of a special case, so do we want to treat it separately? | ||
*AG REPLY -- we don't need this at all and there's no way to code it specifically in ICD10 -- except that such an admission would have the Dx code of the cancer being treated, and the CCI code for the chemotherapy | *AG REPLY -- we don't need this at all and there's no way to code it specifically in ICD10 -- except that such an admission would have the Dx code of the cancer being treated, and the CCI code for the chemotherapy | ||
** emailed Julie and Trish to make sure they are comfortable with this. }} | ** emailed Julie and Trish to make sure they are comfortable with this. | ||
*** Trish, if you are fine with how this is or isn't addressed in ICD10 going fwd, pls remove the tag}} | |||
== Related Articles == | == Related Articles == | ||
Revision as of 14:41, 31 December 2018
Legacy Content
This page is about the pre-ICD10 diagnosis coding schema. See the ICD10 Diagnosis List, or the following for similar diagnoses in ICD10:Click Expand to show legacy content.
| edit dx infobox | |
| Category/Organ System: |
Category: Other Medical (old) |
|
Type: |
|
| Main Diagnosis: | High Dose Chemotherapy-as primary admit |
| Sub Diagnosis: | HIGH DOSE CHEMOTHERAPY-as primary admit |
| Diagnosis Code: | 86900 - High Dose Chemotherapy-as primary admit |
| Comorbid Diagnosis: | |
| Charlson Comorbid coding (pre ICD10): | |
| Program: | |
| Status: | |
| Start Date: | Sep 27 2004 |
High Dose Chemotherapy-as primary admit should be coded only if it is the Primary Admit Diagnosis.
It should not be coded for patients who simply happen to receive chemo during their stay.
|
This page is listed as an exception in Definition of a Medicine Service admission so I wanted to make sure we include that instruction with the new codes. However, what _is_ the new code for this? Found nothing suitable in CCI Picklist, CCI component 2 codes - what was done, and ICD10 Diagnosis List only has Antineoplastic/chemotherapy or immunosuppressive drugs, adverse effect which doesn't seem a real match either. In general we would only code the cancer now, right, but this is a bit of a special case, so do we want to treat it separately?
|
Related Articles
| Related articles: |