Query check tmp BedHeld: Difference between revisions

mNo edit summary
m Text replacement - "cross check " to "cross check "
 
(14 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Data Integrity Check
{{Data Integrity Check
|DIC_summary=Validates that the DtTm for the first [[Service tmp entry]] is the same as that for the first [[Boarding Loc]] entry
|DIC_summary=Sanity check for [[BedHeldEnd DtTm]]
|DIC_related_concepts=BedHeldEnd DtTm; Dispo DtTm
|DIC_related_concepts=BedHeldEnd DtTm; Dispo DtTm
|DIC_firmness=hard check
|DIC_firmness=hard check
|DIC_timing=complete
|DIC_timing=complete
|DIC_coding= query ''XXXXX''
|DIC_coding=query ''check_tmp_BedHeld''
|DIC_implementation_date=
|DIC_implementation_date=2023-05-02
|DIC_status=
|DIC_status=implemented
|DIC_app=CCMDB.accdb
|DIC_app=CCMDB.accdb
|DIC_backlogged=No
}}
}}
 
* dttm entry is always required
Required checks as per Julie:
* for item in ("'''AMA (AWOL)'''", "'''Procedure'''"), [[BedHeldEnd DtTm]] must always be after [[Dispo DtTm]]  
# for AMA AWOL or procedure, bed held end dttm must always be after dispo dttm.  
* if [[BedHeldEnd DtTm]] = [[Dispo DtTm]] and [[Dispo]] = '''"AMA (left against medical advice)"''', should be "'''AMA protocol'''" and vice versa
# if bed held end dttm = dispo dttm and AMA, should be AMA protocol
* for item in ("'''AMA (AWOL)'''", "'''AMA (Protocol)'''"), [[Dispo]] needs to be "AMA" and vice versa
# If item= AMA protocol , the dttm entry is still required.
* if record has [[Dispo]]="AMA (left against medical advice)" there must be a [[BedHeldEnd DtTm]] entry
 
Also:
* For the two AMA entries, [[Dispo]] needs to be "AMA"


== Log ==
== Log ==
* 2023-01-11 Discussed at Task and decided to not have a cross check for "procedure" against "[[Dispo]]"
* 2025-01-08 - updated [[query check_tmp_BedHeld]] to also flag if record has [[Dispo]]="AMA (left against medical advice)" but no [[BedHeldEnd DtTm]] entry
* 2023-01-10 Julie identified needed checks
* 2023-07-06 - the query is being called out of tmp checker, so it must be running now, considering question dealt with
* 2023-05-02 - query defined and written but waiting to find out if this can be before complete or only after (emailed)
* 2023-01-11 - Discussed at JALT and decided to not have a [[cross check]] for "procedure" against "[[Dispo]]"  
* 2023-01-10 - Julie identified needed checks


== Related articles ==  
== Related articles ==