Query check ICD10 stroke: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) m Text replacement - "cross check " to "cross check " |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
[[Stroke, NOS]] should only be used when it is not clear if the stroke was hemorrhagic or ischemic. If the actual type is known, then the appropriate code should be used, so also coding [[Stroke, NOS]] only adds ambiguity. | [[Stroke, NOS]] should only be used when it is not clear if the stroke was hemorrhagic or ischemic. If the actual type is known, then the appropriate code should be used, so also coding [[Stroke, NOS]] only adds ambiguity. | ||
So, we were hoping to have a cross check to prevent combined coding of [[Stroke, NOS]]. However: | So, we were hoping to have a [[cross check]] to prevent combined coding of [[Stroke, NOS]]. However: | ||
If you knew they had a hemorrhagic stroke, but they may or may not have also had an ischemic one, then the correct way to code would be to use [[Stroke, NOS]]. So, this check is not possible. | If you knew they had a hemorrhagic stroke, but they may or may not have also had an ischemic one, then the correct way to code would be to use [[Stroke, NOS]]. So, this check is not possible. | ||
Revision as of 13:26, 20 June 2025
| Data Integrity Checks | |
| Summary: | Stroke, NOS can not be coded with other stroke codes. |
| Related: | Stroke, NOS, Cerebral infarction/stroke due to embolism, Cerebral infarction/stroke, NOS, Hemorrhage, intracerebral/intracranial, nontraumatic (ICH, hemorrhagic stroke), Hemorrhage, subarachnoid or ruptured cerebral aneurysm, Subdural or epidural hematoma/hemorrhage, nontraumatic |
| Firmness: | hard check |
| Timing: | |
| App: | CCMDB.accdb |
| Coding: | query check_ICD10_stroke |
| Uses L Problem table: | not relevant for this app |
| Status: | declined |
| Implementation Date: | |
| Backlogged: | true |
Stroke, NOS should only be used when it is not clear if the stroke was hemorrhagic or ischemic. If the actual type is known, then the appropriate code should be used, so also coding Stroke, NOS only adds ambiguity.
So, we were hoping to have a cross check to prevent combined coding of Stroke, NOS. However: If you knew they had a hemorrhagic stroke, but they may or may not have also had an ischemic one, then the correct way to code would be to use Stroke, NOS. So, this check is not possible.