Swap Locations: Difference between revisions
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) m ex |
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=== possible solution: exclude by filter === | === possible solution: exclude by filter === | ||
{{Discuss | | {{Discuss | | ||
* One option would be to omit lines with current unit is a swap location from the cognos data via filter automatically, but it's not clear if this will result in the previous and subsequent records having non-matching next locations and previous locations. Can we just delete these lines from Cognos? | * One option would be to omit lines with current unit is a swap location from the cognos data via filter automatically, but it's not clear if this will result in the previous and subsequent records having non-matching next locations and previous locations. Can we just delete these lines from Cognos? Ttenbergen 14:03, 2020 August 28 (CDT) | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Discuss | | |||
One problem with filtering these out would be that, I ''think'', the '''unit''' record for a swap location might be the same as the unit record for a successive stay in that unit; ie. the bed entry chagnes, but the unit remains the same. So, the unit start dttm and unit end dttm don't care if part of the unit stay was in a swap location. Is that not true? If it is true, then how would we filter these out? if I eliminate every line that has a swap/swing bed (which I can do) then we will not get any line for those pts who never get into a real bed on that unit (which may be good), but we would still get the ''same'' line with unit start and end times including the swap/swing time for patients who eventually get into a bed on that unit. [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 12:07, 2020 December 2 (CST) | |||
}} | |||
For these reasons all swing bed entries should be filtered out if possible. | |||
=== possible solution: exclude by manual exclude === | === possible solution: exclude by manual exclude === | ||