Query check ICD10 trach dxs consistent: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) m Text replacement - "TISS28 checks" to "TISS28 check" |
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) m fixed template call |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Data Integrity Check | {{Data Integrity Check | ||
| DIC_summary = Tracheostomy related CCI and ICD10 codes must be consistent with each other. | | DIC_summary = Tracheostomy related CCI and ICD10 codes must be consistent with each other. | ||
| DIC_related_concepts = Tracheostomy, has one; | | DIC_related_concepts = Tracheostomy, has one; Tracheostomy complication, hemorrhage from site; Tracheostomy complication, malfunction; Tracheostomy complication, NOS; Tracheostomy complication, tracheo-esophageal fistula; Tracheostomy creation | ||
| DIC_firmness = hard check | | DIC_firmness = hard check | ||
| DIC_timing = | | DIC_timing = | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| DIC_implementation_date = 2019-01-22 | | DIC_implementation_date = 2019-01-22 | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Todo | {{Todo | ||
| who = Tina | | who = Tina | ||
Revision as of 15:19, 16 September 2021
| Data Integrity Checks | |
| Summary: | Tracheostomy related CCI and ICD10 codes must be consistent with each other. |
| Related: | Tracheostomy, has one, Tracheostomy complication, hemorrhage from site, Tracheostomy complication, malfunction, Tracheostomy complication, NOS, Tracheostomy complication, tracheo-esophageal fistula, Tracheostomy creation |
| Firmness: | hard check |
| Timing: | |
| App: | CCMDB.accdb |
| Coding: | Query check_ICD10_trach_dxs_consistent |
| Uses L Problem table: | not relevant for this app |
| Status: | ready to implement |
| Implementation Date: | 2019-01-22 |
| Backlogged: | true |
|
_dev_CCMDB
|
|
- if any trach-implying dxs are present then pt must have at least one code that indicates that they have a trach :
- trach-implying dxs
- code that indicates that they have a trach
- CCI - Tracheostomy creation
- ICD10 - Tracheostomy, has one (Z93.0)
Log
- 2019-04-08 - removed Tracheostomy care from this query; changed how it is structured altogether to test new rule
- 2019-03-20 - previously this also required one of the above if "has one" was present, but that makes no sense, because one could be present without additional care requirements, so have taken that part out. Ttenbergen 12:45, 2019 March 20 (CDT)