Multiple Encounter: Difference between revisions

From CCMDB Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m moved content to Check CRF vs ARF across multiple encounters where this check is discussed
m Encounter vs admission vs record: moved content to Encounter number since that is really what that was about
Line 18: Line 18:
***Isn't this going off onto a tangent?  Depend on how you are looking at the data. Same encounter to one hospital or same encounter to hospital system in the city or new encounter to a hospital or new encounter to the hospital system in the city.  
***Isn't this going off onto a tangent?  Depend on how you are looking at the data. Same encounter to one hospital or same encounter to hospital system in the city or new encounter to a hospital or new encounter to the hospital system in the city.  
**** We are using the terms, and I need to be sure we are all using them in the same way. I don't think that's a tangent, is it? We are using "encounter" to mean different things at different times.[[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 14:24, 30 October 2008 (CDT)
**** We are using the terms, and I need to be sure we are all using them in the same way. I don't think that's a tangent, is it? We are using "encounter" to mean different things at different times.[[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 14:24, 30 October 2008 (CDT)
*Example of one patient:
*1. From Home to HSC transf to CON, transf back to HSC discharged home:
**HSC enc 1
**CON enc 1
**HSC enc 2
**this is the first encounter to hospital system in city.
*2. same patient
*From home to HSC transf to VIC transf to CON transf back to HSC discharged home
**HSC enc 1
**VIC enc 1
**CON enc 2
**HSC enc 3
**this is the second encounter to hospital system in city.
(Tina says: this doesn't help. When qualified as "hospital encounter" or "hospital system encounter" it is all clear. I am concerned because "encounter" by itself could mean either unless apparent from the context. For a query I need to know which is meant, especially if the query then goes on to specify earlier and later encounters...)


==Need to address==  
==Need to address==  

Revision as of 11:06, 22 January 2015

Patients may show up in our database repeatedly. Because our records are patient-ward-stay based, we do not have an inherent link to reflect this.

For patients encountered repeatedly some data should be consistent between stays. The data processor runs a set of checks during vetting that attempts to find and make consistent the records for patients encountered previously. See which article?

If a patient is never discharged in between encounters, patient may be a Continuous Stay. See that article for definitions.

If a patient is discharged and then admitted again at a later time, but soon after the last hospital stay, they may qualify as Re-admission. See that article for definitions.

Terminology and definitions

temporary parking during clean-up


Encounter vs admission vs record
  • Continuous Admission: patients that move between ICU's and wards within their own center or to other centers in the city during the same hospital admission. (Trish)
  • New encounter: when a patient is discharged from the hospital system in the city back to the community and he then returns to the hospital from the community (generally through the ER), this is a new encounter to the hospital system in the city. (Trish)
    • So, does "same encounter" mean the same as "same hospital admission"? We really can't use that since we don't collect on all wards. I was asking Julie about this before, but we didn't finish the discussion. Ttenbergen 14:53, 29 October 2008 (CDT)
      • Isn't this going off onto a tangent? Depend on how you are looking at the data. Same encounter to one hospital or same encounter to hospital system in the city or new encounter to a hospital or new encounter to the hospital system in the city.
        • We are using the terms, and I need to be sure we are all using them in the same way. I don't think that's a tangent, is it? We are using "encounter" to mean different things at different times.Ttenbergen 14:24, 30 October 2008 (CDT)

Need to address

  • check for inconsistencies like brain dead and ARF