Query check ICD10 trach dxs consistent: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) m questions for Julie re. additional testing requirements |
No edit summary |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| DIC_implementation_date = 2019-01-22 | | DIC_implementation_date = 2019-01-22 | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{Discuss| | ||
JALT | |||
*The following had been added some time ago | *The following had been added some time ago | ||
::*This can now include: | ::*This can now include: |
Revision as of 17:57, 16 February 2022
Data Integrity Checks | |
Summary: | Tracheostomy related CCI and ICD10 codes must be consistent with each other. |
Related: | Tracheostomy, has one, Tracheostomy complication, hemorrhage from site, Tracheostomy complication, malfunction, Tracheostomy complication, NOS, Tracheostomy complication, tracheo-esophageal fistula, Tracheostomy creation |
Firmness: | hard check |
Timing: | |
App: | CCMDB.accdb |
Coding: | Query check_ICD10_trach_dxs_consistent |
Uses L Problem table: | not relevant for this app |
Status: | ready to implement |
Implementation Date: | 2019-01-22 |
Backlogged: | true |
![]() |
JALT
|
- if any trach-implying dxs are present then pt must have at least one code that indicates that they have a trach :
- trach-implying dxs
- code that indicates that they have a trach
- CCI - Tracheostomy creation (1.GJ.77)
- ICD10 - Tracheostomy, has one (Z93.0)
- TISS - T23 - Trach Tube Present (TISS Item)
Log
- 2022-02-10 - reviewed the proposed addition and have concerns, flagged for Julie
- 2019-04-08 - removed Tracheostomy care (retired code) from this query; changed how it is structured altogether to test new rule
- 2019-03-20 - previously this also required one of the above if "has one" was present, but that makes no sense, because one could be present without additional care requirements, so have taken that part out. Ttenbergen 12:45, 2019 March 20 (CDT)