Data Integrity Check under review

Cross checks that need review

edit	page	App	Status	Timing	Firmness	Summary	question	who
edit	page	App	Status	Timing	Firmness	Summary	question	who
edit	Function long LOS()	CCMDB.accdb	needs review	complete	soft check	LOS/Length of Stay should not be unlikely long based on historical LOS for a given ward (Service/Location field).
edit	Query check CCI each count vs LOS	CCMDB.accdb	needs review	complete	soft check	Confirm that a Category:Labs Imaging count is not unreasonably high
edit	Query check long transfer delay	CCMDB.accdb	needs review	always	soft check	Is the Transfer Delay (Critical Care) or Transfer Delay (Medicine) unreasonably long?
edit	Query Import request matcher	DSM Labs Consistency check.accdb	needs review	always	not entered	Records in for which we have patients in L_Log but no lab records from DSM
edit	Query s tmp MR	CCMDB.accdb	needs review	complete	hard check	Checks for Project MR
edit	Query check tmp AHC	CCMDB.accdb	needs review	complete	hard check	For patients with Previous Location ER at same site there should be a Boarding Loc ER.	if there is referral sent there must be a referral received entry and a consult dealt with entryLisa Kaita 11:31, 7 August 2025 (CDT) pt could die in between? consult could go missing? In a way those would be really the ones we would want to know about, no? I suppose we could make it a soft check... Ttenbergen 16:26, 19 August 2025 (CDT) this almost sounds like the opposite of how I would have understood the current instructions. I would have thought those to mean to only enter "consult received" if there was no good data for consult sent. How do we actually want to use this?	Lisa
edit	Query check tmp AHC	CCMDB.accdb	needs review	complete	hard check	For patients with Previous Location ER at same site there should be a Boarding Loc ER.	item must not be "not entered" I implemented this one and 40 records in my test data have a "not entered" in complete data. Did I misunderstand the instructions?	Lisa
edit	Query Check VADT too close to first boarding loc	CCMDB.accdb	needs review	always	soft check	no idea hope JM or LK remember	We discussed this in our after-Task meeting 2023-07-23 and I just stumbled across it. I do not remember what this was about, nor what a reasonable delay would be. Could one of you fill in the details for the query if we still want it? No hurry. In fact I'd prefer if you not hurried ;-). Ttenbergen 21:38, 13 August 2025 (CDT) this came about when the Pre-admit Inpatient Institution location is own site and previous location is own ER and the VADT is too close to first boarding loc dttm. If I remember correctly you mentioned 6 hours (0.25d) gap as maybe entry error on the preadmit inpt. Is 12 hours (0.50d) reasonable? --JMojica 09:23, 14 August 2025 (CDT) So this is also about Patients who appear to transfer from in-patient situation to Emergency Room, which would be checked by Query Check_from_ED_and_prev_location_same_site. If the patient is from anywhere else there would be no such thing as vadt being too close to first boarding loc, right? So what is this cut-off, then? Is it a hard check? SMW Cargo Categories	Lisa
edit	Query check tmp Overstay2	CCMDB.accdb	needs review	complete	hard check	Not yet filled in	others?	Julie
edit	Query Check VADT too close to first boarding loc	CCMDB.accdb	needs review	always	soft check	no idea hope JM or LK remember	We discussed this in our after-Task meeting 2023-07-23 and I just stumbled across it. I do not remember what this was about, nor what a reasonable delay would be. Could one of you fill in the details for the query if we still want it? No hurry. In fact I'd prefer if you not hurried ;-). Ttenbergen 21:38, 13 August 2025 (CDT) this came about when the Pre-admit Inpatient Institution location is own site and previous location is own ER and the VADT is too close to first boarding loc dttm. If I remember correctly you mentioned 6 hours (0.25d) gap as maybe entry error on the preadmit inpt. Is 12 hours (0.50d) reasonable? --JMojica 09:23, 14 August 2025 (CDT) So this is also about Patients who appear to transfer from in-patient situation to Emergency Room, which would be checked by Query Check_from_ED_and_prev_location_same_site. If the patient is from anywhere else there would be no such thing as vadt being too close to first boarding loc, right? So what is this cut-off, then? Is it a hard check?	Julie

Related articles

Related articles:

Data Integrity Checks (← links)