Converting Lab Counts to CCI

From CCMDB Wiki
Revision as of 11:24, 25 October 2018 by GHall (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

CCI would allow for the collection of most things we currently collect as counted labs (Category:Manually_collected_labs). This page is for the decision process whether we should go this route.

Should lab counts move to CCI?

  • SMW


  • Cargo


  • Categories

Pros of moving to CCI

  • Consistent storage of information, i.e. stored with all other procedures
  • more detail (e.g. do we mostly do a lab at admission, or right through stay?)

Cons of moving to CCI

time consuming

  • It is much simpler and faster to count the number of CXR's, ABGs, and other tests in our lab counts than to put a CCI entry for each every day they are done.
Laura's testing confirmed that this is tedious   
  • For example:

one patient that was in ICMS for 3 weeks

  • on ECMO had 86 ABG's done in their admission.
  • It took me 15 minutes to just enter the ABG's in CCI.
  • It only takes one minute to enter this item in the old count method off of EPR labs.
  • If I spent the time to enter all the blood products, tests and labs, etc. It would have taken much longer. No one has that much extra time in their day to spend it putting in these CCI entries for every lab. It may work for short stay patients with minimal labs and procedures but not for more complex patients. We need to discuss this. --LKolesar 14:13, 2018 April 20 (CDT)
    • Laura, we discussed your testing at task. A question came up in regards to what method did you use to enter these 86 ABG's?
      • Were you counting number of ABG PER day and then enter that count into CCI and assigning a date? or
      • Did you go from EPR to paper then into CCMDB CCI?
      • Did you use the + button? Trish Ostryzniuk
        • I did the CCI entries exactly as directed using the + button for new entries and putting the # for each day in the column for that. I did it as efficiently as I could, I never use paper. You can likely see it in the profile if you would like to look at it. I think it was MICU profile #31216. I sent it in after April 17th. --LKolesar 07:10, 2018 April 26 (CDT)
          • Entering these tests is very tedious and time consuming and it takes away from our time doing diagnostic coding. It took me 20 mins to enter just CXR's on a patient that was a long stay patient and I was only half done. --LKolesar 14:19, 2018 May 1 (CDT)

CXRs and scan counting in CCI concerns

repeated CXRs - if we do collect them it will be a nuisance; if we don't they won't compare to the labs count CXR we are doing now, that this is supposed to replace. How should we proceed?

  • SMW


  • Cargo


  • Categories
  • Do we have to enter a CXR for each day it is done or can we enter CXR once and then keep using the times feature?
  • For longer stay patients this could be 50 entries.
  • Why do we need to know what day a CXR was done on?
  • What is wrong with using the lab count feature we now use? The same for blood gases and scans.--LBilesky 14:05, 2018 January 19 (CST)
    • That is what is planned for now, but this might be worth talking about again to confirm it is worth it.
      • Does the pt travel out of the unit for this?

Quick look at pts with arrive dttm this year in CFE:

  • 4147 total
  • 3263 had <=3 cxrs
  • 81 had >=15 cxrs
  • 15 had >=30 cxrs
  • none had 50, so not sure where that example came from...

ABG/VBG counting in CCI & concerns

repeated ABG/VBG counts - to many rows of data in CCI & lots of rows to scroll down to check what has been entered. time consuming.

  • SMW


  • Cargo


  • Categories
  • I see arterial blood gases are on the picklist. However, Dr Garland had said that arterial blood gases and venous blood gases will remain in our count list unlike all the other things we count. Should arterial blood gases be removed from the CCI pick list?--LKolesar 13:29, 2018 April 9 (CDT)
  • I have tested a few pts and included ABG/VBG counts.
  • What is this being used for?
  • Is the counting necessary? This is a time Counting is a time consuming task, besides counting now also entering dates.
    • Example: I had 2 pts that had 50-100 ABG/VBG's to count and enter dates for. I found there was too many rows of data in addition to the CCI being collected, so lots to scroll through to check what I had entered. p:Joanna Velasco

Quick look at pts with arrive dttm this year in CFE:

  • 4147 total
  • 2276 had <=3 cxrs
  • 250 had >=15 cxrs
  • 66 had >=30 cxrs
  • 27 had >= 50
  • max was 147, next 90

Summary

Count in CCI pick or component as any other CCI

Code one line, count for duration, kind of like CCI Procedures coded once per ward admission

Questions:

  • CXR - CXR plain film - Laura says tedious, but would be nice to have daily - how common are these really

Template:Discussion

  • What are people doing here for CXR daily or count for the duration?

Related Articles

Related articles: