Add to this by adding the following to the article:
{{Discuss | who = all, Allan, ... | question =
* <put your concern here>}}
This was a reminder to add the information that was discussed regarding linking different infections and their bugs to sepsis/severe sepsis and septic shock, even if blood cultures are negative. Also, our pre-ICD 10 coding would have identified positive blood cultures through the codes severe sepsis, septic shock, or septicemia, as we only coded the bacteria or yeast found in the blood culture with these codes (we would attach the "negative culture" to any septic shock or severe sepsis that had negative blood cultures, even if we had a positive culture from a different source ie. urine or wound swab). Should we now be adding the bacteremia code if we actually have a positive blood culture, so that it is clearly identified and extractable for research purposes, or are we not concerned about specifically tracking positive blood cultures?
Modification date"Modification date" is a predefined property that corresponds to the date of the last modification of a subject and is provided by Semantic MediaWiki.
Last editor is"Last editor is" is a predefined property that contains the page name of the user who created the last revision and is provided by Semantic MediaWiki.
Group E should be different - mine - my ICU. Example - SICU patient taken care by MICU service at MICU bed. in contrast with Group C: SICU patient taken care by SICU service at MICU bed. - --JMojica 15:09, 14 August 2025 (CDT) just came across Proposed future changes to Location and Transfer Ready and related fields about a previous consideration to changing related fields. Ttenbergen 13:28, 27 June 2025 (CDT)
Could you summarize what we would need to change from ICUotherService to get to this? It sounds similar. Ttenbergen 13:25, 17 March 2025 (CDT)
in the example mentioned, the service is STB ICMS and flag in the tmp ICUotherService with item entry CICU under MICU service which is ICCS under ICMS service. the current list we have is clearer and less confusing than ICU other service- MICU. And when this patient is accepted to the STB ICMS as an ICMS patient, we continue the profile and the tmp ICUotherService will have a new line with entry MICU under MICU service. Such profile then will have part of ICMS service as an ICCS patient and as an ICMS patient. In the qtr report, this profile is included in the ICMS unit. However, a separate report if requested can be done if wanted to know the LOS of overflowed patients on borrowed service. --JMojica 17:30, 7 April 2025 (CDT)
this is not only about what data they want, but also about how we would find out which patients we should collect
it might need to include a conversation about why the data is wrong in 10% of cases
Identified as something we should do to streamline data collection. I have made this page to document progress toward this import. Blood gas data is in DSM listing; need to compare to see if we can use it
Allan will revisit with Lab people whether this is obtainable now Ttenbergen 11:34, 2022 February 9 (CST)
z "It was decided that Allan with contact Dr. Embil after COVID is over and see if we can obtain this data from Infection Control. If so, we could import it into the database, and have our data collectors cease obtaining it." - did anything come of that?
I have sent an email to John Lisa Kaita 20:49, 10 March 2025 (CDT)
