Property:DiscussQuestion

From CCMDB Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search

This is a property of type text.

Showing 20 pages using this property.
2
* April 2020 HSC_MICU will admitted both SICU and MICU physician Service patients that are either suspect or confirmed COVID patients. No suspect or positive covid will be admitted to HSC SICU. Though MICU is a close unit the SICU patient in this unit will be under the SICU attending service physician. Depending on skill set required, sometime may be a SICU nurse or just MICU nurse. The nurse bit we will not be able to track. We need to ask Randy and Bojan how they want this tracked in Database in terms of service occupancy. Put service Loc as HSC SICU and tag in TMP as boarding location? Julie would some of the logic applied to bed board apply to how we tag this.   +
* April 2020 HSC_MICU will admitted both SICU and MICU physician Service patients that are either suspect or confirmed COVID patients. No suspect or positive covid will be admitted to HSC SICU. Though MICU is a close unit the SICU patient in this unit will be under the SICU attending service physician. Depending on skill set required, sometime may be a SICU nurse or just MICU nurse. The nurse bit we will not be able to track. We need to ask Randy and Bojan how they want this tracked in Database in terms of service occupancy. Put service Loc as HSC SICU and tag in TMP as boarding location? Julie would some of the logic applied to bed board apply to how we tag this.   +, *Does that mean all those should be removed as [[s_dispo table]] entries? If we keep them in both linking will mess up. ** are you using the tmp entries in linking? I use the s_dispo when I do linking. I use the tmp entries to calculate time spent in each boarding loc and home ward. --[[User:JMojica|JMojica]] 11:03, 2020 April 15 (CDT) *** No, not using tmp entries for linking, but if info is kept in tmp instead of new record added then the dispo entry in previous record or previous entry in next record may not match with the service location.   +, what needs to change on laptops? [[User:TOstryzniuk|Trish Ostryzniuk]] 18:00, 2020 May 12 (CDT)  +,
* Emailed Pagasa to change STB_E5a-880 one to service location STB_E5 so we can delete the STB_E5 entry. Ttenbergen 14:22, 2020 June 5 (CDT)   +, * The pages behind the following links should probably be deleted, since there are no entries for them; however, at least some of them are linked from other places, so those links need to be cleaned up as well...   +
A
z * Identified as something we should do to streamline data collection. I have made this page to document progress toward this import. Blood gas data is in DSM listing; need to compare to see if we can use it  +
* Why would this be an exceptional instruction for STB? What is different about the situation there that would lead to different instructions? [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 11:12, 2021 April 1 (CDT) **This has always been collected at STB this way. (Pam) *** That doesn't mean it should stay that way since we used to collect ''all'' of this only upon arrival. So let's discuss at Task what this should be. The difference is probably really minor, but if we have exceptions it should be clear why. [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 13:57, 2021 April 1 (CDT)   +
Dx grouping * Started to integrate Allan's new list but there were so many discrepancies that I am waiting for confirmation; email sent yesterday. [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 16:40, 2021 March 18 (CDT)  +
I wonder if "null" is actually intended here, or if it was supposed to be 0. Ttenbergen 14:44, 2017 January 8 (CST) *AaDO2 is null if there is no data for FIO2, PaO2 and PaCO2. However, no data was set to zero value instead of null. In addition, AaDO2 and the corresponding score are required only when FIO2 >= 50%, otherwise should be treated as null. (Similarly with PO2 score, it is required when FIO2 < 50% and otherwise should be treated as null. When FIO2 =0, both AaDO2 and its score and PO2 score should be null.) Are we setting null to zero to facilitate the programming calculation? Is it possible to differentiate null from valid zero in both L_LOG and created_variables_CC - will the work be big? In L_LOG, these are the FIO2, CO2, PO2 and SerCO2. 14:49, 2017 March 16 (CDT)  +
this relates to [[Attribution of infections]] and we need to be sure to have it consistent.  +, Como Admit Acquired Primary Limits - this is part of that discussion - if we limit which admits will count as comos we need to review  +, Rules 1 and 2 are clear, could rule 3 be further clarified  +
Como Admit Acquired Primary Limits - this is part of that discussion - if we limit which admits will count as comos we need to review  +, Rules 1 and 2 are clear, could rule 3 be further clarified  +
* does these mean you need to put both below in the article of concerns with question? Why? ** No you don't need to put both. Not sure what happened there. Actually there is an easier way altogether, so I updated it to that. Once you read and understood pls remove the discussion. [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 12:02, 2021 March 17 (CDT)   +
B
This page is linked from the front page, so we should either make it good or get rid of that. Is there anything on [[Publications]] that would be a good example for how our DB was used for this?  +
collectors, please document what your process is at your office location.[[User:TOstryzniuk|Trish Ostryzniuk]] 17:38, 2019 March 5 (CST)  +
*is this the current process, or is [[Bed_census.mdb]]? I think the process is better off here than in the .mdb article.   +, * probably incomplete... Ttenbergen 18:17, 2016 April 14 (CDT) emailed Trish/PAgasa Ttenbergen 16:46, 2018 October 30 (CDT)   +, what is the purpose of having clerk processing this data? *quality control? *preparing for reports? *?  +,
z * Identified as something we should do to streamline data collection. I have made this page to document progress toward this import.  +
Which if any of [[Project_Borrow_arrive#Data_Integrity_Checks_.28SMW.29]] will need to be moved over to this instead?  +
C
There have been concerns about the volume of work generated by CCI entries. Since we had already reduced certain entries earlier in 2019, the numbers referenced here are only for pts admitted during the third quarter of 2019.  +
Como Admit Acquired Primary Limits 1/ Dx grouping - this is part of both of those discussion * Should we be coding cardiac arrest as a comorb if they have a past history of cardiac arrest? Or is it considered resolved? Some of us are coding it as a comorb and some of us aren't. Thanks - Brynn ** TT note: See [[Controlling Dx Type for ICD10 codes]] - we can instruct not to code this specific code as a comorbid, but the problem is likely more widespread and should be addressed that way; Just leaving it here as an example.  +
**A central lines (CL) is a central venous catheters (CVC) that terminates at or close to the heart or one of the great vessels. Great vessels include the pulmonary artery, superior vena cava, inferior vena cava, brachiocephalic, internal jugular, subclavian, external iliac and the common femoral veins. *** Could we link to [[Central Line]] for details instead so that if we change any they will remain consistent?   +
* At least some of these started, but does someone know when this actually got implemented?   +
* Which program do you do this in? This may actually need to be different instructions for different scenarios.   +, * what queries would get you to change a D_ID? We would want to cross-link them so they point to these instructions, and so these instructions can list them as cause.   +, * what queries would get you to change a D_ID for medicine? We would want to cross-link them so they point to these instructions, and so these instructions can list them as cause.   +,