Query check CCI TISS discontinuous ETT

From CCMDB Wiki
Revision as of 13:36, 10 November 2021 by Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Data Integrity Check |DIC_summary=___ Any marked TISS Item in {{TISS w Nr | Planned extubation (TISS Item)}} or in {{TISS w Nr | Unplanned extubation (TISS Item)}} must have...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Data Integrity Checks
Summary: ___

Any marked TISS Item in T28 - Planned extubation (TISS Item) or in T29 - Unplanned extubation (TISS Item) must have the T22 - ETT Present (TISS Item) on the same date.

Related: Insertion of ETT (TISS Item), Planned extubation (TISS Item), Unplanned extubation (TISS Item)
Firmness: soft check
Timing: always
App: CCMDB.accdb
Coding: query check_CCI_TISS_discontinuous_ETT
Uses L Problem table: not relevant for this app
Status: ready to implement
Implementation Date: 2021-11-10
Backlogged: true
  • Cargo


  • SMW


  • Categories:  
  • form:

This query checks for some scenarios around intubation that are possible, but are entered erroneously often enough to make it worth warning about them. It is implemented as a soft check, so collectors can click past it.

  • Should we include a request to add a comment in notes when clicking past this to preempt future follow-up? Ttenbergen 13:36, 2021 November 10 (CST)
  • SMW


  • Cargo


  • Categories

Relevant codes

intubation or extubation

ETT or ventilation

the check


remaining questions

  • Most intubated patients eventually get extubated without getting intubated again; this check would flag every one of them! Is that actually what you want, or am I misunderstanding this one?
  • SMW


  • Cargo


  • Categories
  • I don't even understand when this check would ever make sense... what do you mean with this one?
  • SMW


  • Cargo


  • Categories


Log

  • 2021-11-10

Related articles

Related articles: