Can't check ICD10 ARF vs APACHE ARF: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) m (Text replacement - "CCMDB.mdb" to "CCMDB.accdb") |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
|DIC_coding=not feasible to implement | |DIC_coding=not feasible to implement | ||
|DIC_status=not feasible | |DIC_status=not feasible | ||
|DIC_app=CCMDB. | |DIC_app=CCMDB.accdb | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 11:44, 2019 September 22
Data Integrity Checks | |
Summary: | Can't have ESRD and acute renal failure |
Related: | ARF (APACHE), Kidney, acute renal failure NOS, Kidney, acute renal failure, postprocedural, Kidney, acute tubular necrosis (ATN), Kidney, renal failure/insufficiency/uremia, unspecified as acute or chronic, Renal Coding Considerations for ICD10 |
Firmness: | hard check |
Timing: | always |
App: | CCMDB.accdb |
Coding: | not feasible to implement |
Uses L Problem table: | not relevant for this app |
Status: | not feasible |
Implementation Date: | not entered |
Backlogged: | true |
It used to be impossible to cross-check between dxs and ARF (APACHE) because of different definitions. With ICD10 now, and new definitions (Template:ICD10 Guideline KDIGO Guidelines for Acute Renal Failure), can we build a cross check that ARF (APACHE) can't be checked if pt has Chronic kidney disease (end-stage renal/kidney disease, ESRD), Stage 5, GFR LT 15? And further, would we be able to require that pt has (which) ARF dx in order to have ARF (APACHE) checked? |
cross-checks impossible due to different definitions, see ARF (APACHE) and