ESBL or MRO: Difference between revisions

From CCMDB Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{LegacyContent
| explanation=old pathogen code
| successor=[[Resistance to antimicrobials, extended spectrum beta lactamase (ESBL)]], [[Resistance to antimicrobials, vancomycin]], [[Colonized with organism (not infected)]]
| content=
[[24 - ESBL or MRO]] (extended spectrum beta-lactamase), MRO (meropenem-resistant organism other than Stenotrophomonas)
[[24 - ESBL or MRO]] (extended spectrum beta-lactamase), MRO (meropenem-resistant organism other than Stenotrophomonas)


Line 29: Line 35:


[[Category: UPL (old)]]
[[Category: UPL (old)]]
}}

Latest revision as of 19:52, 2023 April 5

Legacy Content

This page contains Legacy Content.

Click Expand to show legacy content.

24 - ESBL or MRO (extended spectrum beta-lactamase), MRO (meropenem-resistant organism other than Stenotrophomonas)

Use with Category:Infection (old) if it is causing symptoms but we no longer track VRE, ESBL and MRO Colonization.

coding if both pathogen and ESBL status are known

If both the pathogen name and the ESBL status are know, code the pathogen.

supporting documentation

Question: From: Trish Ostryzniuk Subject: RE: code specific pathogen for an infection or if ESBL then code that?

Example: UTI due to E.Coli which is also ESBL on C&S. No past medical history of ESBL.

What would be the priority to code this type of case:

a. UTI due to E.Coli or

b. UTI due to ESBL

Currently we cannot code both UTI due to E.Coli PLUS UTI due to ESBL .

Answer: From: Anand Kumar

UTI with E coli