Quality Assurance queries in CFE: Difference between revisions

From CCMDB Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
← Older edit
mNo edit summary
 
(23 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
If any false positives are found that are unique special cases or if there are errors that we deliberately decide not to correct for some reasons, set them as [[Known data errors]] so they no longer show up in queries.  
If any false positives are found that are unique special cases or if there are errors that we deliberately decide not to correct for some reasons, set them as [[Known data errors]] so they no longer show up in queries.  


{{Discuss | who = Pagasa | question = This manually generated list is now out of date and will be hard to keep up to date. An automatic one exists at [[CFE Data Integrity Checks]] but it is in no priority order. Are these? Can we use the automatic list instead?}}
When they have all been corrected you can move to the next step in [[Centralized data Vetting Process]], likely [["Vet all sent" button]].


== NDC queries / [[CFE Data Integrity Checks]]==
== List of NDC queries ==
# [[PL missing L Tables content]]  
{{#ask: [[Category:Data Integrity Checks]] [[~Query NDC*]] [[DICStatus::implemented||needs review]]
# [[NDC_discharged_incomplete]] (It is ok if there is a list of Incompletes)
|?DICStatus
# [[Postal_code_cross_check|NDC_Bad_Postal_Code]] ([[Postal_code_cross_check]])(This is corrected when time available) 
|format=table
# [[NDC_Missing_TransferDate_w_pivot]] (This is done during reports, OK to skip this one)
|default=none found
# [[NDC_CLI_AcqDX_but_NoCLI_DateinTMPV2]]
|intro=Current list of queries
# [[NDC CLI vs DX but no TISS17 CentralLine]]
}}
# [[NDC_CLI_No_AcqDX_but_CLI_DateinTMPV2]]
# [[NDC_CLI_unacceptable_date]]
# [[NDC_VAP_AcqDX_but_NoVAP_DateinTMPV2]]
# [[NDC_VAP_No_AcqDX_but_VAP_DateinTMPV2]]
# [[NDC_VAP_unacceptable_date]]


{{discussion}} Where on this list would fit:  
{{#ask: [[Category:Data Integrity Checks]] [[~Query NDC*]]
* [[Check VAP vs TISS ventilated]]
|?DICStatus
* [[NDC Pacemaker TISS wo acquired]]
|format=table
* [[query NDC Pacemaker acquired vs TISS]]
|default=none found
|searchlabel=Full list of queries including declined, retired, etc
|limit=0
}}
 
== Related articles ==
{{Related Articles}}


{{Discuss | who=Pagasa | question =
* need to confirm that all of [[CFE Data Integrity Checks]] are addressed. }}


[[Category:Data Processing]]
[[Category:Data Processing]]
[[Category:Postal Codes]]
[[Category:Postal Codes]]

Latest revision as of 11:05, 15 July 2021

We have a bunch of Quality Assurance queries in CFE that are done as part of the Centralized data Vetting Process. Ideally all should be empty, if they are not the data needs to be fixed (see Processing errors in patient data).

The easiest way to check these is to click the NDCs button. It will check every query but only display those where problems were found.

If any false positives are found that are unique special cases or if there are errors that we deliberately decide not to correct for some reasons, set them as Known data errors so they no longer show up in queries.

When they have all been corrected you can move to the next step in Centralized data Vetting Process, likely "Vet all sent" button.

List of NDC queries

Current list of queries

 DICStatus
Query NDC Bad Postal Codeimplemented
Query NDC Postal Code over timeimplemented
Query NDC dx implying death across encountersimplemented

Full list of queries including declined, retired, etc

Related articles

Related articles:
Retrieved from "https://ccmdb.kuality.ca/index.php?title=Quality_Assurance_queries_in_CFE&oldid=151204"