CCMDB Wiki

Lab identification in the DSM data: Difference between revisions

← Older edit
m Text replacement - "[[Category: " to "[[Category:"
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 11: Line 11:
=== Start of date range ===
=== Start of date range ===
The Lab_DtTm is compared to the admit time of the patient as follows:  
The Lab_DtTm is compared to the admit time of the patient as follows:  
* <code>" WHERE ([Arrive_DtTm]<=" & LabDtTm_str & ") AND (" & LabDtTm_str & "<=nz([Dispo_DtTm],now())) "</code>
* <code>" WHERE ([Admit_DtTm]<=" & LabDtTm_str & ") AND (" & LabDtTm_str & "<=nz([Dispo_DtTm],now())) "</code>
** ie we start the range with the [[Arrive_DtTm]], not the [[Accept_DtTm]]
** ie we start the range with the [[Admit DtTm]]
{{DJ |
* We should change this; however, do we only change it going forward or do we also re-import back data? Julie is about to re-import back data until 2019-01-01, so maybe we should reimport back data for all that far?
** shouldn't it be ''Accept_DtTm'' and use ''Arrive_DtTm'' if ''[Accept_DtTm'' is blank. We have discussed that in the Project Boarding Loc, we can still determine the counts in between ''Accept_DtTm'' and ''Arrive_DtTm'' if needed.  --[[User:JMojica|JMojica]] 10:25, 2019 December 10 (CST)
*** That is pretty much what I mean, it should be as you say. Do we want to do this going back in data as you re-import, or just going forward for future imports? Ttenbergen 09:41, 2019 December 11 (CST)
**** Yes going forward.  also this time using first service dttm.  --[[User:JMojica|JMojica]] 16:36, 2022 February 16 (CST)
***** As in, use the ''Admit DtTm'' with the definition we have decided in there, right? [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 19:48, 2022 February 17 (CST)
}}
{{Todo
| who = Tina
| question =  1 _dev_DSM
* Change this to use new [[Admit DtTm]] definition. [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 19:48, 2022 February 17 (CST)
| todo_added = 2021-09-02
| todo_action = 
}}


=== date constraints ===
=== date constraints ===
Line 32: Line 18:
*<code>[Arrive_DtTm]<=CDate(Nz([COLLECTEDDATE],[arriveddate]))+CDate(Nz([CollectedTime],[LabarrivedTime]))</code>
*<code>[Arrive_DtTm]<=CDate(Nz([COLLECTEDDATE],[arriveddate]))+CDate(Nz([CollectedTime],[LabarrivedTime]))</code>
*<code>CDate(Nz([COLLECTEDDATE],[arriveddate]))+CDate(Nz([CollectedTime],[LabarrivedTime]))<=[Dispo_DtTm]</code>
*<code>CDate(Nz([COLLECTEDDATE],[arriveddate]))+CDate(Nz([CollectedTime],[LabarrivedTime]))<=[Dispo_DtTm]</code>
=== counts ===
=== counts ===
We originally did labs as counts, but now store them with results. A count of them can be viewed using query ''L_Labs_Flowsheet_DSM_sum''.
We originally did labs as counts, but now store them with results. A count of them can be viewed using query ''L_Labs_Flowsheet_DSM_sum''.
Line 51: Line 38:




[[Category: DSM Labs Extract]]
[[Category:DSM Labs Extract]]
Retrieved from "https://ccmdb.kuality.ca/index.php?title=Lab_identification_in_the_DSM_data"