Query NDC cardioversion dx vs TISS: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) m Text replacement - "Cardioversion -- excl defibrillation which we are not tracking separately" to "Cardioversion (EXCLUDE defibrillation-we are not tracking)" |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
* if there is even one [[TISS28]] T41, then there must be a Cardioversion complication | * if there is even one [[TISS28]] T41, then there must be a Cardioversion complication | ||
{{DA | Don't think this was ever implemented. CCI Code is [[Cardioversion (EXCLUDE defibrillation-we are not tracking)]]. Should we implement this now? }} | {{DA | Don't think this was ever implemented. CCI Code is [[Cardioversion (EXCLUDE defibrillation-we are not tracking)]]. Should we implement this now? | ||
* yes, please implement. --[[User:JMojica|JMojica]] 15:34, 2018 November 15 (CST)}} | |||
[[Category:TISS28 checks]] | [[Category:TISS28 checks]] | ||
[[Category:CCI Px check]] | [[Category:CCI Px check]] | ||
Revision as of 15:34, 15 November 2018
| Data Integrity Checks | |
| Summary: | If the Cardioversion 76335 is coded in complications, then the TISS28 item Cardioversion (TISS Item) (T41) must be marked. |
| Related: | Cardioversion, Cardioversion (TISS Item), Cardioversion (EXCLUDE defibrillation-we are not tracking) |
| Firmness: | hard check |
| Timing: | complete |
| App: | Centralized data front end.accdb |
| Coding: | not entered |
| Uses L Problem table: | No |
| Status: | needs review |
| Implementation Date: | not entered |
| Backlogged: | true |
Two tests
- if there is a Cardioversion complications then there must be at least one TISS28 T41
- if there is even one TISS28 T41, then there must be a Cardioversion complication
|
Don't think this was ever implemented. CCI Code is Cardioversion (EXCLUDE defibrillation-we are not tracking). Should we implement this now? * yes, please implement. --JMojica 15:34, 2018 November 15 (CST) |