Query check CCI from OR no CCI: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| DIC_implementation_date = date change was rolled out / first applied | | DIC_implementation_date = date change was rolled out / first applied | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Discuss | who = all | question = | {{Discuss | who = all | question = | ||
* is this actually a reasonable cross-check? What would be a false positive for this? | * is this actually a reasonable cross-check? What would be a false positive for this? | ||
**Agree, there should be at least one [[CCI Procedure]] in admit. --[[User:JMojica|JMojica]] 14:16, 2018 November 13 (CST) | **Agree, there should be at least one [[CCI Procedure]] in admit. --[[User:JMojica|JMojica]] 14:16, 2018 November 13 (CST) | ||
*** Having an entry is already taken care of in [[Query check CCI must have entry]], this check would mean that for pt from OR or PACU the CCI entry must be other than [[No procedure performed]]. | |||
}} | |||
== Related articles == | == Related articles == | ||
{{Related Articles}} | {{Related Articles}} | ||
Revision as of 15:02, 18 November 2018
| Data Integrity Checks | |
| Summary: | If from OR or PACU, must have at least 1 CCI Procedure - IS THAT REASONABLE? |
| Related: | CCI Procedure, Previous Location |
| Firmness: | hard check (not allowed) or soft check (allowed, but give error; in CFE this means it has to go into the ... table, and cross checks have to consider that table) |
| Timing: | |
| App: | CCMDB.mdb |
| Coding: | how to find this in containing program, eg. SAS file, function name, query name... |
| Uses L Problem table: | not relevant for this app |
| Status: | needs review |
| Implementation Date: | date change was rolled out / first applied |
| Backlogged: | true |
|
|