Query NDC cardioversion dx vs TISS: Difference between revisions

From CCMDB Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m Ttenbergen moved page NDC cardioversion dx vs TISS to Query NDC cardioversion dx vs TISS: Text replacement - "NDC cardioversion dx vs TISS" to "Query NDC cardioversion dx vs TISS"
m Text replacement - "NDC_cardioversion_dx_vs_TISS" to "Query NDC_cardioversion_dx_vs_TISS"
Line 4: Line 4:
|DIC_firmness=hard check
|DIC_firmness=hard check
|DIC_timing=complete
|DIC_timing=complete
|DIC_coding=query ''NDC_cardioversion_dx_vs_TISS''
|DIC_coding=query ''Query NDC_cardioversion_dx_vs_TISS''
|DIC_implementation_date=2019/01/06
|DIC_implementation_date=2019/01/06
|DIC_status=implemented
|DIC_status=implemented

Revision as of 00:19, 7 February 2019

Data Integrity Checks
Summary: If pt has Acquired Procedure Cardioversion (EXCLUDE defibrillation-we are not tracking), then the TISS28 item Cardioversion (TISS Item) (T41) must be marked.
Related: Cardioversion (TISS Item), Acquired Procedure, Cardioversion (EXCLUDE defibrillation-we are not tracking)
Firmness: hard check
Timing: complete
App: Centralized data front end.accdb
Coding: query Query NDC_cardioversion_dx_vs_TISS
Uses L Problem table: Yes
Status: implemented
Implementation Date: 2019/01/06
Backlogged: true
  • Cargo


  • SMW


  • Categories:  
  • form:

Three tests

Excluded because it would cause false positives:

  • if both are present dates should be the same; since there could be more than one, matching multiple would require a different query to specifically match dates and only for existing ones; if we decide this is required we can revisit.