Query NDC cardioversion dx vs TISS: Difference between revisions

From CCMDB Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m Text replacement - "TISS28 checks" to "TISS28 check"
mNo edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
|DIC_coding=query ''Query NDC_cardioversion_dx_vs_TISS''
|DIC_coding=query ''Query NDC_cardioversion_dx_vs_TISS''
|DIC_implementation_date=2019-01-06
|DIC_implementation_date=2019-01-06
|DIC_status=ready to implement
|DIC_status=retired
|DIC_app=CCMDB.accdb
|DIC_app=CFE
|DIC_backlogged=No
|DIC_backlogged=No
}}
}}
Line 17: Line 17:
Excluded because it would cause false positives:  
Excluded because it would cause false positives:  
* if both are present dates should be the same; since there could be more than one, matching multiple would require a different query to specifically match dates and only for existing ones; if we decide this is required we can revisit.
* if both are present dates should be the same; since there could be more than one, matching multiple would require a different query to specifically match dates and only for existing ones; if we decide this is required we can revisit.
== Log ==
* 2021-10-07 - deleted query from [[CFE]]
* 2020-10-01  - collectoin of [[Cardioversion (TISS Item)]] stopped so this query became irrelevant.


== Related articles ==  
== Related articles ==  

Revision as of 13:57, 7 October 2021

Data Integrity Checks
Summary: If pt has Acquired Procedure Cardioversion (EXCLUDE defibrillation-we are not tracking), then the TISS28 item T26 & 27 - Cardioversion (TISS Item) (T41) must be marked.
Related: Cardioversion (TISS Item), Acquired Procedure, Cardioversion (EXCLUDE defibrillation-we are not tracking)
Firmness: hard check
Timing: complete
App: CFE
Coding: query Query NDC_cardioversion_dx_vs_TISS
Uses L Problem table: not relevant for this app
Status: retired
Implementation Date: 2019-01-06
Backlogged: No
  • Cargo


  • SMW
"CFE" is not in the list (SAP, not entered, Centralized data front end.accdb, DSM Labs Consistency check.accdb, CCMDB.accdb, TISS28.accdb) of allowed values for the "DICApp" property. 
  • Categories:  
  • form:

Three tests

Excluded because it would cause false positives:

  • if both are present dates should be the same; since there could be more than one, matching multiple would require a different query to specifically match dates and only for existing ones; if we decide this is required we can revisit.

Log


Related articles

Related articles: