LAU collection readmission data: Difference between revisions

Line 15:

=== Data Entry Instructions ===

~~The~~ following ~~lines will automatically be added to each new medicine record~~, ~~existing records entered prior to the start date~~ of the ~~project will need to have these entered manually:~~

Follow the definition in [[Readmission to MedWard]]. If you find that either this admission is a re-admission, or that there is a re-admission following this admission, enter one of the following.

* '''Project: LAU Readm''' - Item: "has previous" - Date/Time: that admission's dispo_dttm

* '''Project: LAU Readm''' - Item: "has later" - Date/Time: that admission's service start_dttm

* Checkbox, Integer, Real, Comment: not used

Enter this even if the partner-record is also part of the [[LAU Collection Project]]; yes, we would be able to find that re-admission in our usual way, but having all the data coded the same way will make it more consistent to analyze.

{{DT|

* If the first admission and the readmission are part of our current review?, do we still enter the tmp project? or will you connect the two admissions when analyzing the data? [[User:Lkaita|Lisa Kaita]] 19:07, 4 March 2025 (CST)

** I think we should, that way the stats are more straightfwd for this. But we may want to know more about what the other admission was. Do we want to have more items, such as "previous med" or "later ICU"? [[Readmission to MedWard]] says "Readmission is attributed to the site or hospital from which the patient was discharged. "; so we would not need details for the future site, but might want them for the previous, even if we only did as little as "same" and "other". [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 19:00, 5 March 2025 (CST)

** I think we should, that way the stats are more straightfwd for this. But we may want to know more about what the other admission was. Do we want to have more items, such as "previous med" or "later ICU"? [[Readmission to MedWard]] says "Readmission is attributed to the site or hospital from which the patient was discharged. "; so we would not need details for the future site, but might want them for the previous, even if we only did as little as "same" and "other". I started to add this above, if I got it right then pls delete this comment. [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 19:00, 5 March 2025 (CST)

* do we include readmission if the previous admission was ICU? [[User:Lkaita|Lisa Kaita]] 11:39, 5 March 2025 (CST)

** [[Readmission to MedWard]] only considers it a re-admission if they left the hospital setting in between. Is that what you mean here, that they were in an ICU, went home and then came to LAU? [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 19:00, 5 March 2025 (CST) }}

==== Sources ====

* History and physical

@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 === Data Entry Instructions ===
-The following lines will automatically be added to each new medicine record, existing records entered prior to the start date of the project will need to have these entered manually:
+Follow the definition in [[Readmission to MedWard]]. If you find that either this admission is a re-admission, or that there is a re-admission following this admission, enter one of the following.
 * '''Project: LAU Readm''' - Item: "has previous" - Date/Time: that admission's dispo_dttm
 * '''Project: LAU Readm''' - Item: "has later" - Date/Time: that admission's service start_dttm
 * Checkbox, Integer, Real, Comment: not used
+Enter this even if the partner-record is also part of the [[LAU Collection Project]]; yes, we would be able to find that re-admission in our usual way, but having all the data coded the same way will make it more consistent to analyze.
 {{DT|
 * If the first admission and the readmission are part of our current review?, do we still enter the tmp project? or will you connect the two admissions when analyzing the data? [[User:Lkaita|Lisa Kaita]] 19:07, 4 March 2025 (CST)
-** I think we should, that way the stats are more straightfwd for this. But we may want to know more about what the other admission was. Do we want to have more items, such as "previous med" or "later ICU"? [[Readmission to MedWard]] says "Readmission is attributed to the site or hospital from which the patient was discharged. "; so we would not need details for the future site, but might want them for the previous, even if we only did as little as "same" and "other". [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 19:00, 5 March 2025 (CST)
+** I think we should, that way the stats are more straightfwd for this. But we may want to know more about what the other admission was. Do we want to have more items, such as "previous med" or "later ICU"? [[Readmission to MedWard]] says "Readmission is attributed to the site or hospital from which the patient was discharged. "; so we would not need details for the future site, but might want them for the previous, even if we only did as little as "same" and "other". I started to add this above, if I got it right then pls delete this comment. [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 19:00, 5 March 2025 (CST)
 * do we include readmission if the previous admission was ICU? [[User:Lkaita|Lisa Kaita]] 11:39, 5 March 2025 (CST)
 ** [[Readmission to MedWard]] only considers it a re-admission if they left the hospital setting in between. Is that what you mean here, that they were in an ICU, went home and then came to LAU? [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 19:00, 5 March 2025 (CST) }}
 ==== Sources ====
 * History and physical