Service Sending to ICU: Difference between revisions

LKolesar (talk | contribs)
special case - ER -> OR -> ICU: special case not required, or am I missing something?
Line 22: Line 22:
* Scenario: The service is consulted in emergency, an OR or procedure is planned and an ICU stay is planned post-op but the patient was not on an inpatient ward.  
* Scenario: The service is consulted in emergency, an OR or procedure is planned and an ICU stay is planned post-op but the patient was not on an inpatient ward.  
* Collection: If the patient '''had been accepted to a service''', ie admitted and therefore now an inpatient, even if they were still physically in the ER, then code Service Sending with the specific service.   
* Collection: If the patient '''had been accepted to a service''', ie admitted and therefore now an inpatient, even if they were still physically in the ER, then code Service Sending with the specific service.   
{{discussion}} Would pt ever go to OR without having been accepted? Ttenbergen 17:39, 2016 March 21 (CDT)
**{{discussion}} Would pt ever go to OR without having been accepted? Ttenbergen 17:39, 2016 March 21 (CDT)
* A pt has to be accepted by a surgical service before going to the OR for surgery. --[[User:LKolesar|LKolesar]] 06:38, 2016 April 27 (CDT)
*** A pt has to be accepted by a surgical service before going to the OR for surgery. --[[User:LKolesar|LKolesar]] 06:38, 2016 April 27 (CDT)
**** You'd code the surgical service that did the surgery, right? So why is this a special case, then? I think this special case can be deleted. Or am I missing something? Ttenbergen 19:15, 2016 April 28 (CDT)


=== How to determine? ===
=== How to determine? ===