Check pre acute consistent: Difference between revisions
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Data Integrity Check | {{Data Integrity Check | ||
| DIC_summary = | | DIC_summary = | ||
| DIC_related_concepts = | | DIC_related_concepts = | ||
| DIC_firmness = hard check (not allowed) or soft check | | DIC_firmness = hard check (not allowed) or soft check | ||
| DIC_timing = | | DIC_timing = | ||
| DIC_app = CCMDB.mdb | | DIC_app = CCMDB.mdb | ||
| DIC_coding = query ''' | | DIC_coding = query '''check pre acute consistent''' | ||
| DIC_status = needs review | | DIC_status = needs review | ||
| DIC_implementation_date = | | DIC_implementation_date = | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 20:56, 15 October 2018
| Data Integrity Checks | |
| Summary: | |
| Related: | |
| Firmness: | hard check (not allowed) or soft check |
| Timing: | |
| App: | CCMDB.mdb |
| Coding: | query check pre acute consistent |
| Uses L Problem table: | not relevant for this app |
| Status: | needs review |
| Implementation Date: | |
| Backlogged: | true |
I found cases where the pre-living situation for direct admits are not consistent with previous location and/or dispo. I want the DC to be aware that the pre-living situation has relationship with the previous location or dispo specifically for PCH cases.
Example pre-living situation = assisted living; previous location = Winnipeg PCH
pre-living situation = supportive home; previous location = St Amant
I rely on the combination of pre-living situation, previous location, postal code and dispo fields to identified new or already PCH resident prior to admission. Data collectors must understand that assisted living and supportive home are not PCH and must be entered as simply HOME as confirmed by Dr Roberts .
Pre acute living situation field Dispo_field Previous_Location_field
|
need analyze further. |