Function Dispo Chronological(): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
== Transfer vs (accept vs arrive) == | == Transfer vs (accept vs arrive) == | ||
{{Discuss | who = | {{Discuss | who = Task | question = | ||
* I just came across the error “Arrive_DtTm can't be greater than Transfer_Ready_DtTm.” in CCMDB. It made me wonder… I suppose that a TR could be before Arrive if it’s after Accept. | * I just came across the error “Arrive_DtTm can't be greater than Transfer_Ready_DtTm.” in CCMDB. It made me wonder… I suppose that a TR could be before Arrive if it’s after Accept. | ||
** First, Trish, do you think I am right about that? | ** First, Trish, do you think I am right about that? | ||
Revision as of 14:28, 7 January 2019
| Data Integrity Checks | |
| Summary: | Checks that the registry times are in a sensible chronological order. |
| Related: | Arrive DtTm, Accept DtTm, Transfer Ready DtTm, Dispo DtTm |
| Firmness: | hard check |
| Timing: | always |
| App: | CCMDB.mdb |
| Coding: | Function Dispo Chronological() |
| Uses L Problem table: | not relevant for this app |
| Status: | implemented |
| Implementation Date: | 2016-05-25 |
| Backlogged: | true |
The check will generate an error if:
- Arrive DtTm has to be before or equal to Accept DtTm
- Arrive DtTm has to be before or equal Transfer Ready DtTm
- Arrive DtTm has to be before Dispo DtTm
- Transfer Ready DtTm has to be before Dispo DtTm
- Dispo DtTm has to be before Now() / today
No checks on Visit Admit DtTm field since taken direct from EPR, so it is what it is.
Transfer vs (accept vs arrive)
Transfer time rule
|
Will want to reconcile Transfer time rule |
