Query NDC cardioversion dx vs TISS: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) m Ttenbergen moved page NDC cardioversion dx vs TISS to Query NDC cardioversion dx vs TISS: Text replacement - "NDC cardioversion dx vs TISS" to "Query NDC cardioversion dx vs TISS" |
(No difference)
| |
Revision as of 00:19, 7 February 2019
| Data Integrity Checks | |
| Summary: | If pt has Acquired Procedure Cardioversion (EXCLUDE defibrillation-we are not tracking), then the TISS28 item Cardioversion (TISS Item) (T41) must be marked. |
| Related: | Cardioversion (TISS Item), Acquired Procedure, Cardioversion (EXCLUDE defibrillation-we are not tracking) |
| Firmness: | hard check |
| Timing: | complete |
| App: | Centralized data front end.accdb |
| Coding: | query NDC_cardioversion_dx_vs_TISS |
| Uses L Problem table: | Yes |
| Status: | implemented |
| Implementation Date: | 2019/01/06 |
| Backlogged: | true |
Three tests
- if there is Acquired Procedure Cardioversion (EXCLUDE defibrillation-we are not tracking) then there must be at least one Cardioversion (TISS Item)(T41)
- if there is even one Cardioversion (TISS Item)(T41), then there must be a Acquired Procedure Cardioversion (EXCLUDE defibrillation-we are not tracking)
Excluded because it would cause false positives:
- if both are present dates should be the same; since there could be more than one, matching multiple would require a different query to specifically match dates and only for existing ones; if we decide this is required we can revisit.