Query NDC cardioversion dx vs TISS: Difference between revisions

From CCMDB Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m has question for task that should be addressed before implementing
m was excluded some time ago, old question
Line 10: Line 10:
|DIC_backlogged=No
|DIC_backlogged=No
}}
}}
{{DiscussTask |
 
*  [[Cardioversion (EXCLUDE defibrillation-we are not tracking)]] and {{TISS w Nr | Cardioversion (TISS Item)}} are very similar, should we continue to collect both? [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 19:59, 2020 December 2 (CST)
}}
Three tests
Three tests
* if there is [[Acquired Procedure]] [[Cardioversion (EXCLUDE defibrillation-we are not tracking)]] (a collect first item) then there must be at least one {{TISS w Nr | Cardioversion (TISS Item)}}
* if there is [[Acquired Procedure]] [[Cardioversion (EXCLUDE defibrillation-we are not tracking)]] (a collect first item) then there must be at least one {{TISS w Nr | Cardioversion (TISS Item)}}

Revision as of 14:56, 15 June 2021

Data Integrity Checks
Summary: If pt has Acquired Procedure Cardioversion (EXCLUDE defibrillation-we are not tracking), then the TISS28 item T26 & 27 - Cardioversion (TISS Item) (T41) must be marked.
Related: Cardioversion (TISS Item), Acquired Procedure, Cardioversion (EXCLUDE defibrillation-we are not tracking)
Firmness: hard check
Timing: complete
App: CCMDB.accdb
Coding: query Query NDC_cardioversion_dx_vs_TISS
Uses L Problem table: not relevant for this app
Status: needs review
Implementation Date: 2019-01-06
Backlogged: No
  • Cargo


  • SMW


  • Categories:  
  • form:

Three tests

Excluded because it would cause false positives:

  • if both are present dates should be the same; since there could be more than one, matching multiple would require a different query to specifically match dates and only for existing ones; if we decide this is required we can revisit.

Related articles

Related articles: