Pre-admit Inpatient Institution field: Difference between revisions
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) m →Ambiguous locations: care homes |
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) →Ambiguous locations: ambiguous previous locations |
||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
The following are considered inpatient locations in this context: | The following are considered inpatient locations in this context: | ||
* [[EMIP]]s are considered | * [[EMIP]]s are considered | ||
** {{discussion}} or are they... by definition currently you go home from EMIP, waiting for clarification. Ttenbergen 09:37, 2016 May 11 (CDT) | |||
* day-surgery patients ending up on our unit directly | * day-surgery patients ending up on our unit directly | ||
The following are '''not''' considered inpatient locations, enter "NA / not applicable" | The following are '''not''' considered inpatient locations, enter "NA / not applicable" |
Revision as of 09:37, 11 May 2016
This field is currently being implemented, please check the instructions and put a discussion for anything that isn't clear.
The Pre-admit Inpatient Institution field identifies the previous inpatient location of patients who were already inpatients elsewhere before coming to our unit. This does not include patients who just arrived at an ER elsewhere and were not admitted as inpatient there.
For example, a patient arriving from Selkirk Hospital via the local ER would have the ER coded in the Previous Location field and Selkirk coded in the Pre-admit Inpatient Institution field.
Collection Instruction
For each patient,
- enter the option that most closely matches
- if you know the situation but nothing on the list matches closely, enter other - known but not listed
- if the situation is unknown, enter location missing/unknown
- if the patient did not come from an inpatient location, enter "not applicable", for example if they came from home or a clinic. The ER is not an inpatient location.
If you know how we code the location exactly, you can type it. Otherwise press the "magic wand" button to take you to the S dispo chooser to help filter options if desired.
Where to find this information
If patient came from a different Winnipeg hospital this will be recorded in the “Visit History” on the EPR.
Example
- ICU Vic---family medicine ward at the Vic---ED HSC---ED STB---cath lab---ICU HSC.
- The PrevInptLocation field is: VIC_Ward
Ambiguous locations
The following are considered inpatient locations in this context:
- EMIPs are considered
- Template:Discussion or are they... by definition currently you go home from EMIP, waiting for clarification. Ttenbergen 09:37, 2016 May 11 (CDT)
- day-surgery patients ending up on our unit directly
The following are not considered inpatient locations, enter "NA / not applicable"
- care homes
movement within the same hospital
If a patient gets transferred from one ward in a hospital to another ward, enter the previous ward as both the Previous Location field and the Pre-admit Inpatient Institution field.
Cath lab confusion
We did not use to collect cath lab and would instead code the location before, usually ER. We will now allow cath lab. If a patient comes from the cath lab it does not result in any other exceptional collection instructions. If they were an inpatient before, without interruption, code that location as Pre-admit Inpatient Institution field. If they were not an inpatient code it as not available.
Questions
how about nursing stations?
- We used to collect nursing stations in hospital previous but would not include them under the new scheme because they are not inpatient locations.
- We are planning a meeting with Randy Martin to discuss. For now you can't enter nursing stations here, so, don't. Ttenbergen 18:16, 2016 April 28 (CDT)
- Nursing stations are not inpatient locations, so don't code these. Treat as you would any external doctor's office: code NA. Ttenbergen 12:58, 2016 May 9 (CDT)
- We are planning a meeting with Randy Martin to discuss. For now you can't enter nursing stations here, so, don't. Ttenbergen 18:16, 2016 April 28 (CDT)
Readmission from Grace/HSC Nursing Home
- currently discharges to and admissions from Grace Nursing Home are treated as new admissions (with the exception of the Discharge Screening Tool which is labelled 'transferred form'). Technically, though, this is an interhospital transfer, and the hospital treats it as a continuous admission. Will this require a previous Inpatient Institution entry? And will the visit admission date then be the original admission date, or the date transferred from one ward to the other? SCortilet
- We treat these nursing home wards as inpatient locations for at least some scenarios. We will treat them as inpatient locations for this.
- E.G.code Grace Nursing Home as Previous Location field and code Grace Ward (or e.g. VIC_S5 if known) as Pre-admit Inpatient Institution field.
- Visit Admit DtTm field is the original hospital admit DtTm.
Data Use / Purpose
To document where those patients who were inpatients immediately before arriving on our ward/unit came from.
The detailed information will allow us also to distinguish between patients who were or were not inpatients before arrival. This is relevant to a patient's risk of bad outcomes.
The information will also give our administrators a better idea of which other hospitals are sending us patients, which they will use for planning.
Template:CCMDB Data Integrity Checks
- Records for all Admit froms in #Temporary locations need to have an entry (possibly "none")
- Records for all Admit froms not in #Temporary locations need to not have an entry
Not yet implemented Ttenbergen 14:11, 2015 May 27 (CDT)
- Template:Discussion do these make sense? (old q from Tina)
- YES. if these are done, you may delete the ones I wrote above. JMojica 12:31, 2015 May 28 (CDT)
Reports
Template:Discussion Which reports will this be on? Ttenbergen 10:33, 2016 March 22 (CDT)
Implementation
The field is populated with options from the s_dispo table.
Legacy
This field is part of the 2016 Time and Place changes and did not previously exist.