Bacteremia: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) m Text replacement - "| MinimumCombinedCodes = }} {{ICD10 dx " to "}} {{ICD10 dx | MinimumCombinedCodes = " |
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) m question re. combined code |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ICD10 transition status | {{ICD10 transition status | ||
| OldDxArticle =Septicemia| CurrentStatus = freshly automatically generated article | | OldDxArticle =Septicemia | ||
| CurrentStatus = freshly automatically generated article | |||
| InitialEditorAssigned = Allyson Alcudia | | InitialEditorAssigned = Allyson Alcudia | ||
}} | }} | ||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| BugRequired= required | | BugRequired= required | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ICD10 category|Infectious disease}}{{ICD10 category|Symptom/Sign}}{{ICD10 category|Testing}} | |||
{{ICD10 category|Infectious disease}}{{ICD10 category|Symptom/Sign}} | |||
== Additional Info == | == Additional Info == | ||
*Bacteremia is a lab finding, not a disease. Following our general rule, code symptoms, signs and diagnostic abnormalities when the underlying CAUSE is unknown. If that cause is known, then of course you must code it, and coding the abnormal finding is optional. | *Bacteremia is a lab finding, not a disease. Following our general rule, code symptoms, signs and diagnostic abnormalities when the underlying CAUSE is '''unknown'''. If that cause is known, then of course you must code it, and coding the abnormal finding is optional. | ||
**So, if the patient has a known infection AND/OR '''[[Severe sepsis]]''' OR '''[[Shock, septic]]''' you MUST code those. | **So, if the patient has a known infection AND/OR '''[[Severe sepsis]]''' OR '''[[Shock, septic]]''' you MUST code those. | ||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
*Any infection that is the source of this bacteremia. | *Any infection that is the source of this bacteremia. | ||
*[[Fungemia, NOS]] | *[[Fungemia, NOS]] | ||
== Candidate [[Combined ICD10 codes]] == | == Candidate [[Combined ICD10 codes]] == | ||
*Code the organism. | *Code the organism. {{ICD10|needs review}} If you knew the organism then why would it be coded as NOS in the first place? Ttenbergen 23:22, 2017 November 17 (CST) | ||
*Others, as mentioned above. | *Others, as mentioned above. | ||
Revision as of 23:22, 17 November 2017
ICD10 Diagnosis | |
Dx: | Bacteremia |
ICD10 code: | A49.9 |
Pre-ICD10 counterpart: | Septicemia |
Charlson/ALERT Scale: | none |
APACHE Como Component: | none |
APACHE Acute Component: | 2019-0: Neuro NOS |
Start Date: | |
Stop Date: | |
External ICD10 Documentation |
This diagnosis is a part of ICD10 collection.
Additional Info
- Bacteremia is a lab finding, not a disease. Following our general rule, code symptoms, signs and diagnostic abnormalities when the underlying CAUSE is unknown. If that cause is known, then of course you must code it, and coding the abnormal finding is optional.
- So, if the patient has a known infection AND/OR Severe sepsis OR Shock, septic you MUST code those.
Alternate ICD10s to consider coding instead or in addition
- Shock, septic
- Severe sepsis
- Any infection that is the source of this bacteremia.
- Fungemia, NOS
Candidate Combined ICD10 codes
- Code the organism. Template:ICD10 If you knew the organism then why would it be coded as NOS in the first place? Ttenbergen 23:22, 2017 November 17 (CST)
- Others, as mentioned above.
Related Articles
Show all ICD10 Subcategories