Service Sending to ICU
NOT ACTIVE YET as of 11-May-2015
Purpose
To identify the "sending service" or "originating service" for those who came to ICU from a prior inpatient location (refer to Task Meeting Minutes April 13,2015). This is different to the "service of the attending" during the patient's stay in ICU.
Data Collection Instructions
For each patient who meets the following conditions:
- critical care patient
- was a prior inpatient before coming to ICU (even if arrived via temp location such as ER, procedure suite...)
- doesn't arrive from another ICU (ie not an inter or intra transfer)
add a single tmp entry with the following:
- project: sending service
- item: one of the following:
- Cardiology, Medicine, Surgery, Neuro, Family Med, Ob/Gyne, etc (STB_Critical_Care_Collection_Guide#Patient_origins_and_types might help with list)
- apparently we are waiting to hear back about details from Allan at next Task meeting Template:Discuss@task
- Cardiology, Medicine, Surgery, Neuro, Family Med, Ob/Gyne, etc (STB_Critical_Care_Collection_Guide#Patient_origins_and_types might help with list)
- the other tmp fields are not used
Start/End Dates
- Start: not yet determined
- End: there is no planned end date
Template:CCMDB Data Integrity Checks
- each critical care pt from location where this entry is required has exactly one entry
- only populated when the patient's immediate physical location prior to ICU are Wards, OR, PACU, and in some temporary locations.
- ie when Admit from is in a certain subset? If not, how would we check this? Ttenbergen 12:25, 2015 May 28 (CDT)
- we can add Not Applicable and therefore won't allow blanks.
- sounds good... Ttenbergen 11:04, 2015 June 1 (CDT)
- we can add Not Applicable and therefore won't allow blanks.
- ie when Admit from is in a certain subset? If not, how would we check this? Ttenbergen 12:25, 2015 May 28 (CDT)
- only populated when the patient's immediate physical location prior to ICU are Wards, OR, PACU, and in some temporary locations.
- if have more than one entry per patient, the last entry will be considered as final value.
- why would there ever be more than one? Ttenbergen 12:25, 2015 May 28 (CDT)
- if by accident DC did the entry twice and with different values.
- will be taken care of by only allowing one of these per pt Ttenbergen 11:04, 2015 June 1 (CDT)
- if by accident DC did the entry twice and with different values.
- why would there ever be more than one? Ttenbergen 12:25, 2015 May 28 (CDT)
make this a regular field?
No because this is a request only from Critical Care Management and not from Medicine Management?
See also
to do
- confirm definitions with Julie, Trish, Con and Laura
- does this fit in with all of STB Cardiac Care patients Template:Discussion
- last-ish: clean up articles:
- STB Cardiac Care patients and integrate with this one
- STB_CCU_Collection_Guide
- STB_CICU_Collection_Guide#ECMO_Patient_Type
- STB Critical Care Collection Guide
- Registry Patient Type
- Any other articles? Template:Discussion
- "Once this tmp study section is active we can go back to making the pt type relate to the type of diagnosis." (Laura K)
- How about pt from ER after consult - is consult sufficient to "blame" consulted service? Ttenbergen 11:20, 2015 June 1 (CDT)