CFE Inline Integrity Checks: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
|||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
** any T has to be after the B it's linked to | ** any T has to be after the B it's linked to | ||
*** how about T the same as B it's linked to? see cases like this. should we allow? or T must increment one minute from B. --[[User:JMojica|JMojica]] 10:11, 2022 August 10 (CDT) | *** how about T the same as B it's linked to? see cases like this. should we allow? or T must increment one minute from B. --[[User:JMojica|JMojica]] 10:11, 2022 August 10 (CDT) | ||
**** Pulling that out for Lisa... [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 15:56, 2022 August 10 (CDT) | |||
** any S/B has to be before any CCI and ICD10, and D has to be after these | ** any S/B has to be before any CCI and ICD10, and D has to be after these | ||
* Pagasa, Julie, can you think of other things to check? | * Pagasa, Julie, can you think of other things to check? | ||
Line 23: | Line 24: | ||
** T should not have missing time or should not have check mark. - --[[User:JMojica|JMojica]] 10:11, 2022 August 10 (CDT) | ** T should not have missing time or should not have check mark. - --[[User:JMojica|JMojica]] 10:11, 2022 August 10 (CDT) | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{DL| | |||
* Julie says she is seeing some [[Transfer Ready DtTm tmp entry]] with same DtTm as their corresponding [[Boarding Loc]]. The way I read [[Transfer_Ready_DtTm_tmp_entry#Data_entry_instructions]] that should be impossible, ie becoming ready at the same time as arriving, no? [[query check_transfer_DtTm_during_admission]] would allow ''at'' BL but not before. Same for [[query check_Transfer_DtTm_after_paired_BL_and_before_later_BL]]. So right now we let BL = TR through, but we likely should not. Agree? [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 15:56, 2022 August 10 (CDT) | |||
}} | |||
{{Discuss | who = Pagasa | | {{Discuss | who = Pagasa | | ||
* Would running these queries just before vetting work for Pagasa? [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 16:24, 2022 August 9 (CDT) | * Would running these queries just before vetting work for Pagasa? [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 16:24, 2022 August 9 (CDT) |
Revision as of 15:56, 2022 August 10
Pagasa edits in CFE, and right now there are no checks in place for typos in these edits.
When and how would these checks run?
Cross-checks in CCMDB are triggered by collectors checking the various "complete" boxes, but there is no equivalent to this in CFE, especially since Pagasa can legitimately edit tables directly or via query, so these checks would likely need to be triggered manually, likely between Quality Assurance queries in CFE and actually setting records to "vetted".
What sort of checks do we actually want?
|
|
|
Related articles
Related articles: |