Query TISS Errors BIPAP vs BIPAP2300: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) m (removed duplication of summary) |
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) m (Text replacement - "TISS28 checks" to "TISS28 check") |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{LegacyContent | |||
|explanation=no longer collecting [[BIPAP at 2300 (TISS Item)]] so nothing to compare | |||
|content= | |||
{{Data Integrity Check | {{Data Integrity Check | ||
|DIC_summary=Any marked TISS Item {{TISS w Nr | BIPAP at 2300 (TISS Item)}} has to have a corresponding marked TISS Item {{TISS w Nr | Non-invasive CPAP or BIPAP (TISS Item)}} for the same date. | |DIC_summary=Any marked TISS Item {{TISS w Nr | BIPAP at 2300 (TISS Item)}} has to have a corresponding marked TISS Item {{TISS w Nr | Non-invasive CPAP or BIPAP (TISS Item)}} for the same date. | ||
Line 4: | Line 8: | ||
|DIC_firmness=hard check | |DIC_firmness=hard check | ||
|DIC_coding=query ''TISS_Errors_BIPAP_vs_BIPAP2300'' | |DIC_coding=query ''TISS_Errors_BIPAP_vs_BIPAP2300'' | ||
|DIC_status= | |DIC_status=retired | ||
|DIC_LProblem=Yes | |DIC_LProblem=Yes | ||
|DIC_app=TISS28.accdb | |DIC_app=TISS28.accdb | ||
Line 13: | Line 17: | ||
{{Related Articles}} | {{Related Articles}} | ||
[[Category:Legacy TISS28 check]] | |||
[[Category: | |||
Latest revision as of 11:33, 2021 September 8
{{LegacyContent |explanation=no longer collecting BIPAP at 2300 (TISS Item) so nothing to compare |content=
Data Integrity Checks | |
Summary: | Any marked TISS Item T - BIPAP at 2300 (TISS Item) has to have a corresponding marked TISS Item T21 - Non-invasive CPAP or BIPAP (TISS Item) for the same date. |
Related: | Non-invasive CPAP or BIPAP (TISS Item), BIPAP at 2300 (TISS Item) |
Firmness: | hard check |
Timing: | always |
App: | TISS28.accdb |
Coding: | query TISS_Errors_BIPAP_vs_BIPAP2300 |
Uses L Problem table: | not relevant for this app |
Status: | retired |
Implementation Date: | not entered |
Backlogged: | No |
Related articles
Related articles: |