Query check tmp ER Boarding Loc should exist if from ER: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) m (doesn't need whole task group) |
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
The converse is not true, since a patient could board in ER after admission, e.g. GRA ICU uses their ER | The converse is not true, since a patient could board in ER after admission, e.g. GRA ICU uses their ER | ||
{{DiscussTask | JALT | {{DiscussTask | JALT | ||
* how about the cases who did not wait at all at ER but immediately went to the Ward or ICU ? - do they still need the first boarding loc be ER? Some DCs entered at least 1 minute difference between first boarding loc ER and second boarding loc - if this is being done, what does the [[LOS per Location]] mean when there is 1 minute or 5 minutes or 30 minutes at ER. Are the ICU or Med service really taking care of them at ER in such short stay? --[[User:JMojica|JMojica]] 14:16, 2022 March 21 (CDT) | * how about the cases who did not wait at all at ER but immediately went to the Ward or ICU ? - do they still need the first boarding loc be ER? Some DCs entered at least 1 minute difference between first boarding loc ER and second boarding loc - if this is being done, what does the [[LOS per Location]] mean when there is 1 minute or 5 minutes or 30 minutes at ER. Are the ICU or Med service really taking care of them at ER in such short stay? --[[User:JMojica|JMojica]] 14:16, 2022 March 21 (CDT) | ||
Line 16: | Line 17: | ||
** This was discussed at TASK and the decision was create a soft check for collectors to check this, as we know that stays in ER less than 30 minutes are often errors, can this be removed? [[User:Lkaita|Lisa Kaita]] 08:32, 2022 April 28 (CDT) | ** This was discussed at TASK and the decision was create a soft check for collectors to check this, as we know that stays in ER less than 30 minutes are often errors, can this be removed? [[User:Lkaita|Lisa Kaita]] 08:32, 2022 April 28 (CDT) | ||
*** The soft check would flag it for review, but Julie's question was what is the correct thing to actually enter in that scenario. The check can't address that. [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 10:58, 2022 May 4 (CDT) | *** The soft check would flag it for review, but Julie's question was what is the correct thing to actually enter in that scenario. The check can't address that. [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 10:58, 2022 May 4 (CDT) | ||
**** Discuss at JALT: Lisa explained that for SICU there can be the same time for start of ER, surgery and SICU; collectors then pull this apart to actual entries. Julie will provide info on amount of problem in complete data. Lisa to ask STB ICU what the story is with these. [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 11:59, 2022 November 30 (CST) | |||
}} | }} | ||
== Log == | == Log == |
Revision as of 12:59, 2022 November 30
Data Integrity Checks | |
Summary: | For patients with Previous Location ER at same site there should be a Boarding Loc ER. |
Related: | Boarding Loc, Previous Location |
Firmness: | soft check |
Timing: | always |
App: | CCMDB.accdb |
Coding: | query check_tmp_ER_Boarding_Loc_should_exist_if_from_ER; function from_ER(); query check_pt_from_ER |
Uses L Problem table: | not relevant for this app |
Status: | implemented |
Implementation Date: | 2021-01-15 |
Backlogged: | No |
The converse is not true, since a patient could board in ER after admission, e.g. GRA ICU uses their ER
JALT
|
Log
- 2021-09-07 turned from hard check to soft check since this is possible after a collection rule change some time ago
- 2021-01-15 - check implemented
Related articles
Related articles: |