Service Sending to ICU
NOT ACTIVE YET as of 11-May-2015
Purpose
To identify the "sending service" or "originating service" for those who came to ICU from a prior inpatient location (refer to Task Meeting Minutes April 13,2015). This is different to the "service of the attending" during the patient's stay in ICU.
Data Collection Instructions
For each critical care' patient who were a prior inpatient before coming to ICU, add a tmp entry with the following:
- project: sending service
- item: one of the following:
- Cardiology, Medicine, Surgery, Neuro, Family Med, Ob/Gyne, etc
- If the patient comes from a temporary location like ER, Cath lab, other procedure suite, etc and was an inpatient in an acute care institution before that temporary location and the service is known, indicate the entry in the item.
- If the patient comes from an ICU (e.g. inter or intra transfers), no entry is needed.
- STB_Critical_Care_Collection_Guide#Patient_origins_and_types might help with list
- the other tmp fields are not used.
Start/End Dates
- Start: not yet determined
- End: there is no planned end date
Template:CCMDB Data Integrity Checks
- each critical care pt has exactly one
- Template:Discussion we should pre-populate the tmp line with an unacceptable value a la Postal Code.
make this a regular field?
Template:Discussion Or make it a standard field. In that case would we want this for Medicine as well?
See also
to do
- confirm definitions with Julie, Trish, Con and Laura
- does this fit in with all of STB Cardiac Care patients Template:Discussion
- last-ish: clean up articles:
- STB Cardiac Care patients and integrate with this one
- STB_CCU_Collection_Guide
- STB_CICU_Collection_Guide#ECMO_Patient_Type
- STB Critical Care Collection Guide
- Registry Patient Type
- Any other articles? Template:Discussion
- "Once this tmp study section is active we can go back to making the pt type relate to the type of diagnosis. Also, we no longer need to split a pt stay into 2 or more profiles. " (Laura K)