Search by property

Jump to navigation Jump to search

This page provides a simple browsing interface for finding entities described by a property and a named value. Other available search interfaces include the page property search, and the ask query builder.

Search by property

A list of all pages that have property "DiscussQuestion" with value "Dx grouping There would be no way to exclude post-first-48hr Acquireds from the calculation. Do we care? Or should this only be Admits?". Since there have been only a few results, also nearby values are displayed.

⧼showingresults⧽

View (previous 1,000 | next 1,000) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)


    

List of results

     (Dx grouping There would be no way to exclude post-first-48hr Acquireds from the calculation. Do we care? Or should this only be Admits?)
    • STB ICUs VAP Rate, CLIBSI Rate Summary  + ( * IIRC we collected [[CAM positive (TISS Item)]]</br>* IIRC we collected [[CAM positive (TISS Item)]] specifically for this, right? If so, can we stop collecting it? And can we make sure a stoppage like this in the future results in reviewing what we collect? [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 10:02, 2024 March 20 (CDT)</br>** Delirium rate per 1000 days per unit is being reported in the [[OIT Report]]s. ---[[User:JMojica|JMojica]] 11:49, 2024 March 20 (CDT)</br>*** As in [[Delirium days]] is reported in [[Critical Care Program Quality Indicator Report]]? But that doesn't mention anything about per-1000-days. [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 17:00, 2024 March 20 (CDT)</br>*** The rate is mentioned in the succeeding definition with the delirium days as numerator. Your proposal here is to stop collecting TISS item CAM positive which I disagree because that TISS item is being used and reported as rate in [[OIT Report]]. Besides, the reason why it was dropped in in the STB VAPCLI report is because the requestor has changed. Brett Hiebert who used to request this was involved in the VAP group and another Delirium group so he asked to have both as one request. Brett had left and the VAP group filled up a new request to continue the VAP data and not on the delirium data. --[[User:JMojica|JMojica]] 13:58, 2024 March 25 (CDT)</br>[[User:JMojica|JMojica]] 13:58, 2024 March 25 (CDT) )
    • Category:Symptom/Sign  +
    • Category:Testing  +
    • Hypocalcemia, severe or symptomatic  +
    • SBGH Swing Beds  + (Are there actually differences in how CC, Are there actually differences in how CC, Med or different laptops do this? Or is the following correct for all? </br></br>* Since any [[CUS]] entry at STB may be either a swing bed or a real bed, service locations and times need review. </br>* For Medicine, the swing bed entries will often be obvious as the unit stays will be a matter of minutes</br>* If a [[CUS]] entry is for a swing bed, manually exclude using the [["exclude" button]] </br>* Any ICU pt. may be placed into a swing bed, but the majority of swing beds are used for the ICCS pt's. The pt. is placed in a swing bed while in the OR, and then moved into a real bed post op when they arrive in the CICU. Their stay in a swing bed may be any length of time. The true arrive Dt/Tm is taken from the ICU flow sheets.</br>* if a pt. was placed into an ICU swing bed but was never admitted to the ICU, the pt. entries are manually excluded from [[Cognos]] when reviewed.</br></br>* I would feel more comfortable if a collector from SBGH reviewed this, as I haven't been there for some time and I am not 100% certain how they are dealing with swing beds [[User:Lkaita|Lisa Kaita]] 13:06, 2022 August 24 (CDT)</br>*Pam tweaked the above, just waiting for Val to weigh in [[User:Lkaita|Lisa Kaita]] 13:30, 2022 August 24 (CDT) </br>** Are we still waiting for feedback on this one? [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 15:57, 2023 May 24 (CDT)[[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 15:57, 2023 May 24 (CDT))