Swap Locations: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Some sites use swap locations as entries in [[EPR]] | Some sites use swap locations as entries in [[EPR]]. | ||
When patients need to switch locations due to medical reasons, patient swap locations can be performed in the ADT EPR. For example, patient A and patient B need to switch locations. Patient A is in a private room and patient B is in a semi-private room. Both patients could be transferred into the swap location or non-census location, freeing up both of the unit beds. Then both Patient A and Patient B can be transferred into the correct unit and room/bed. | |||
== The problem == | |||
Swing or swap locations are not real locations. While listed as in a swap location, the pt might still be in the old location or already be in a new location that gets entered after. Collectors seem to review the chart, make sense of what actually happened, and enter accordingly. | |||
{{Discuss | Is there ever "room for interpretation" where both collectors would still consider the pt on their unit, or where both would consider them already/still on the other unit? If not, how and why?}} | |||
The use of swap or swing locations makes it hard to follow patients in [[Cognos Report Integrator]], so we need to find out more about how these are used. | |||
=== possible solution: exclude by filter === | |||
{{Discuss | | |||
* One option would be to omit lines with current unit is a swap location from the cognos data via filter automatically, but it's not clear if this will result in the previous and subsequent records having non-matching next locations and previous locations. Can we just delete these lines from Cognos? Discussing with Lisa... Ttenbergen 14:03, 2020 August 28 (CDT) | |||
}} | }} | ||
=== possible solution: exclude by manual exclude === | |||
{{Discuss | | {{Discuss | | ||
* | * Another option, and this seems to be what is being done now, is for collectors to "exclude" unit lines from Cognos that list "wrong" start or end times because part of the time is in a swap location. | ||
}} | }} | ||
This will not exclude the record from [[Cognos2 Ender]] since that is based on service rather than unit. | |||
== Location specific info == | |||
=== "Swing beds" at STB === | |||
{{Discuss | | {{Discuss | | ||
Are the following the STB ones? | Are the following the STB ones? | ||
| Line 29: | Line 38: | ||
* SBGH-L2ME-L2SWG-01 | * SBGH-L2ME-L2SWG-01 | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{TT | | |||
* Whenever this gets finalized we need to also update [[STB CICU Collection Guide]] to make sure it's consistent. }} | |||
=== ??? at HSC === | |||
{{Discuss | | {{Discuss | | ||
* Do these exist at HSC and what are they called? I didn't see any bed names that made me think "swing" or "swap". | * Do these exist at HSC and what are they called? I didn't see any bed names that made me think "swing" or "swap". | ||
}} | }} | ||
=== "Swap locations" at GRA === | |||
These show up in the AsgnBed_Current as: | |||
* GH-SWAP Location | |||
== Related articles == | == Related articles == | ||
Revision as of 12:47, 2020 December 2
Some sites use swap locations as entries in EPR.
When patients need to switch locations due to medical reasons, patient swap locations can be performed in the ADT EPR. For example, patient A and patient B need to switch locations. Patient A is in a private room and patient B is in a semi-private room. Both patients could be transferred into the swap location or non-census location, freeing up both of the unit beds. Then both Patient A and Patient B can be transferred into the correct unit and room/bed.
The problem
Swing or swap locations are not real locations. While listed as in a swap location, the pt might still be in the old location or already be in a new location that gets entered after. Collectors seem to review the chart, make sense of what actually happened, and enter accordingly.
|
Is there ever "room for interpretation" where both collectors would still consider the pt on their unit, or where both would consider them already/still on the other unit? If not, how and why? |
The use of swap or swing locations makes it hard to follow patients in Cognos Report Integrator, so we need to find out more about how these are used.
possible solution: exclude by filter
|
|
|
possible solution: exclude by manual exclude
|
|
|
This will not exclude the record from Cognos2 Ender since that is based on service rather than unit.
Location specific info
"Swing beds" at STB
|
|
Are the following the STB ones? AsgnBed_Current
|
|
|
|
??? at HSC
|
|
|
"Swap locations" at GRA
These show up in the AsgnBed_Current as:
- GH-SWAP Location
Related articles
| Related articles: |