Task Team Meeting - Rolling Agenda and Minutes 2024

From CCMDB Wiki
Revision as of 11:47, 2024 January 1 by Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) (Created page with "__NOTOC__ == List of items to bring to task meeting == Add to this by adding the following '''to the article where the problem is documented''': <pre>{{DiscussTask | explanation}}</pre> {{#cargo_query: tables=Discussions, _pageData |join on=Discussions._pageName=_pageData._pageName |fields=Discussions._pageName=wiki page, question, _modificationDate=Last modified |where=_pageData._pageName<>"MediaWiki:Common.js" and who="Task" |limit=1000 |rows per page=200 |default=...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

List of items to bring to task meeting

Add to this by adding the following to the article where the problem is documented:

{{DiscussTask | explanation}}

Toggle columns: Last modified

wiki page question Last modified
wiki page question Last modified
Gangrene, NOS can we use this code for necrosis or necrotic wounds? Lisa Kaita 11:57, 2024 April 17 (CDT)
  • discussed at April 24 TASK Allan will give this thought and address it at next TASK Lisa Kaita 20:01, 2024 April 24 (CDT)
2024-04-25 1:01:29 AM
Sepsis (SIRS due to infection, without acute organ failure) How hard of a rule is lactate >2? If they meet the criteria for septic shock with the exception of a high enough lactate, can we code septic shock Lisa Kaita 12:17, 2024 April 17 (CDT)
  • discussed at TASK April 24, Dr Ziegler is researching various definitions of septic shock and will speak to this at next TASK Lisa Kaita 19:57, 2024 April 24 (CDT)
  • 2019-03-09 9:24:42 PM
    Severe sepsis How hard of a rule is lactate >2? If they meet the criteria for septic shock with the exception of a high enough lactate, can we code septic shock Lisa Kaita 12:17, 2024 April 17 (CDT)
  • discussed at TASK April 24, Dr Ziegler is researching various definitions of septic shock and will speak to this at next TASK Lisa Kaita 19:57, 2024 April 24 (CDT)
  • 2019-10-31 3:04:29 PM
    Severe sepsis How hard of a rule is lactate >2? If they meet the criteria for septic shock with the exception of a high enough lactate, can we code septic shock Lisa Kaita 12:17, 2024 April 17 (CDT)
  • discussed at TASK April 24, Dr Ziegler is researching various definitions of septic shock and will speak to this at next TASK Lisa Kaita 19:57, 2024 April 24 (CDT)
  • 2022-02-17 10:56:05 PM
    Shock, septic How hard of a rule is lactate >2? If they meet the criteria for septic shock with the exception of a high enough lactate, can we code septic shock Lisa Kaita 12:17, 2024 April 17 (CDT)
  • discussed at TASK April 24, Dr Ziegler is researching various definitions of septic shock and will speak to this at next TASK Lisa Kaita 19:57, 2024 April 24 (CDT)
  • 2019-01-10 7:32:04 PM
    STB ICUs VAP Rate, CLIBSI Rate Summary
  • IIRC we collected CAM positive (TISS Item) specifically for this, right? If so, can we stop collecting it? And can we make sure a stoppage like this in the future results in reviewing what we collect? Ttenbergen 10:02, 2024 March 20 (CDT)
    • Delirium rate per 1000 days per unit is being reported in the OIT Reports. ---JMojica 11:49, 2024 March 20 (CDT)
      • As in Delirium days is reported in Critical Care Program Quality Indicator Report? But that doesn't mention anything about per-1000-days. Ttenbergen 17:00, 2024 March 20 (CDT)
      • The rate is mentioned in the succeeding definition with the delirium days as numerator. Your proposal here is to stop collecting TISS item CAM positive which I disagree because that TISS item is being used and reported as rate in OIT Report. Besides, the reason why it was dropped in in the STB VAPCLI report is because the requestor has changed. Brett Hiebert who used to request this was involved in the VAP group and another Delirium group so he asked to have both as one request. Brett had left and the VAP group filled up a new request to continue the VAP data and not on the delirium data. --JMojica 13:58, 2024 March 25 (CDT)
  • 2024-04-08 4:27:53 PM
    Stroke, NOS we need clarification on when to use this code, eg. if there is a history where it says a history of stroke, or if on CT they comment remote lacunar infarcts? Lisa Kaita 12:01, 2024 April 17 (CDT) 2024-04-17 5:01:53 PM
    Template:ICD10 Guideline Sepsis How hard of a rule is lactate >2? If they meet the criteria for septic shock with the exception of a high enough lactate, can we code septic shock Lisa Kaita 12:17, 2024 April 17 (CDT)
  • discussed at TASK April 24, Dr Ziegler is researching various definitions of septic shock and will speak to this at next TASK Lisa Kaita 19:57, 2024 April 24 (CDT)
  • 2024-04-25 12:57:46 AM

    Also see Task Team Meeting - Rolling Agenda and Minutes 2022

    _

    _

    ICU Database Task Group Meeting – November 23, 2023

    • Present: Allan, Pagasa, Pam, Joanna, Barret, Julie, Brynn, Mailah, Val, Gail
    • Minutes prepared by: AG
    • Action items in BOLD

    1. Regarding the prior idea to expand our ICD-10 coding to include ALL actual ICD-10-CA codes.

    • Lisa reports that while this was generally supported in talking to the data collectors, there was also a sense that we should delay further discussion on this until a more opportune time.

    2. Julie reports that she has noted some patients who have different or otherwise contradictory postal codes during a single episode of care.

    • We note that postal codes derive from the ADT/Cognos system.
    • As it's unlikely that more than a trivial number of patients are moving residences over such a short timespan, we need more details about this and Julie will obtain such information for us to discuss at the next Task meeting.

    3. An issue arose about patients who present to ED at a given hospital and have ICU team involvement while there, but subsequently either die in ED or are transferred to another hospital (e.g. from Grace ED to Gold surgery at HSC). Specifically the question is about if/how to include them in the ICU database, and if so exactly when to code the ICU team as beginning to provide care.

    • This question is complicated by a wide range of types of care provided by the ICU team in ED. It continuously spans from consultation with small actual involvement, all the way up to functionally taking over care while in ICU. While the latter should be included in the ICU database, the former should not. And of course there's everything in between.
    • Part of this is that putting in an ICU admission for such a patient in ED results in the ICU team having to write a discharge summary and transfer note -- which is paperwork we'd seek to avoid.
    • For Grace we discussed 2 possible solutions, both involving the ICU attending making a judgement for ED patients in whom they are contributing to care whether or not to count that person as "being on the ICU service" even if she/he never gets to an ICU in that hospital:
      • Actually put in an ICU admission
      • Don't put in an ICU admission, but record such patients in a separate portion of the ICU logbook.
      • Barret will discuss this with Heather Smith and report back at the next Task meeting.
    • After we come up with a solution for Grace, we will need to discuss solutions for HSC and St. B.

    4. About coding decubitus ulcers.

    • We validated that when an acquired diagnosis should be entered for both de novo decubs that develop in ICU, and for progression of pre-existing decubs (e.g. from Stage 2 to Stage 3).
    • We also looked at data on ICU-acquired decubs from Grace over time. This arose because the rate of such ulcers developing or worsening in the Grace ICU seem much higher than in other ICUs. It is not clear whether Grace is high or other ICUs are low. Upon further assessment, these rates rose precipitously from last quarter of 2021 to the 1st quarter of 2022. Most likely this coincides with some change in how decubs are recorded.
      • Gail will seek information about if/how such changes in recording of decubs may have happened from Jan 2022 onwards.

    ICU Database Task Group Meeting – October 26, 2023

    • Present: Allan, Pagasa, Pam, Joanna, Brynn, Mindy, Stephanie, Val,
    • Minutes prepared by: AG
    • Action items in BOLD

    1. New question about A81.2 Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy (PML) (caused by JC virus). A recent case highlighted (as already listed in the Wiki) that there are causes other than JC virus. Accordingly, we agreed that: we will change the name to remove the "caused by JC virus" portion. Also, Allan altered the Wiki accordingly.

    2. There was a discussion about the idea of expanding our ICD10 coding to include ALL codes, not just the reduced version we've been using. Various collectors commented that it is not rare that they find a specific ICD10 code online for a given entity, but have to "shoehorn" it into some "NOS" code or other. On the other hand, it would mean expanding and needing collectors to know the full list of 16,000 ICD10 codes. Allan will notify Lisa of this, and ask her to discuss it with the collector group.. The collectors met on Nov 9, 2023 with Julie present, Tina was not available but discussed it with Lisa and Julie at another meeting. In general, all collectors agree it is a good idea, however given all the changes it was felt it was best to defer this to a later date. Consideration needs to be given to wiki articles, reporting etc.

    3. Next meeting will be Nov 23@1100

    New Items:

    2023...

    Also see Task Team Meeting - Rolling Agenda and Minutes 2023