Hypercalcemia: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
| (4 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
== Additional Info == | == Additional Info == | ||
* The | * The criteria for coding this are: | ||
** Ca++ >= 3.3 | ** Ca++ >= 3.3 | ||
** ionized Ca++ >=1.6 | ** ionized Ca++ >=1.6 | ||
* | *Presence/absence of signs or symptoms are not part of the coding criterion, though they are: | ||
**GI - anorexia, nausea\vomiting, constipation, abdominal pain, increased acid production (dyspepsia, PUD), pancreatitis | **GI - anorexia, nausea\vomiting, constipation, abdominal pain, increased acid production (dyspepsia, PUD), pancreatitis | ||
**Neuromuscular - weakness, proximal myopathy, decreased tone, decreased DTRs | **Neuromuscular - weakness, proximal myopathy, decreased tone, decreased DTRs | ||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
Serum corrected calcium is not reported. Instead if there is a concern for hyper/hypocalcemia an ionized calcium is now recommended. | Serum corrected calcium is not reported. Instead if there is a concern for hyper/hypocalcemia an ionized calcium is now recommended. | ||
{{ICD10 Guideline Electrolytes}} | |||
{{ICD10 Guideline repeated events}} | {{ICD10 Guideline repeated events}} | ||
| Line 40: | Line 41: | ||
== Log == | == Log == | ||
* 2025-02-27 - Changed from Ca++ > 3.5 '''OR''' any Ca++ > 2.55 AND in the presence of signs or symptoms believed to be due to hypercalcemia '''OR'''any Ca++ > 2.55 with active treatment for hypercalcemia | * [[Task Team Meeting - Rolling Agenda and Minutes 2025#ICU Database Task Group Meeting – February 27, 2025 | 2025-02-27 (item 4)]] - Changed from Ca++ > 3.5 '''OR''' any Ca++ > 2.55 AND in the presence of signs or symptoms believed to be due to hypercalcemia '''OR''' any Ca++ > 2.55 with active treatment for hypercalcemia | ||
* 2024-03-04 - SH/DSM sent out a memo that serum corrected calcium will no longer be reported. Instead if there is a concern for hyper/hypocalcemia an ionized calcium is now recommended. | * 2024-03-04 - SH/DSM sent out a memo that serum corrected calcium will no longer be reported. Instead if there is a concern for hyper/hypocalcemia an ionized calcium is now recommended. | ||
* [[Task_Team_Meeting_-_Rolling_Agenda_and_Minutes_2018#ICU Database Task Group Meeting – February 12, 2018 | 2018-02-12 (item 2)]] - decided to use thresholds as before ICD10 | * [[Task_Team_Meeting_-_Rolling_Agenda_and_Minutes_2018#ICU Database Task Group Meeting – February 12, 2018 | 2018-02-12 (item 2)]] - decided to use thresholds as before ICD10 | ||
Latest revision as of 08:51, 10 April 2025
| ICD10 Diagnosis | |
| Dx: | Hypercalcemia |
| ICD10 code: | E83.52 |
| Pre-ICD10 counterpart: | Other Metabolic problems |
| Charlson/ALERT Scale: | none |
| APACHE Como Component: | none |
| APACHE Acute Component: | 2019-0: Renal/Metabolic NOS, 2019-0: Metabolic/Renal NOS |
| Start Date: | |
| Stop Date: | |
| Data Dependencies(Reports/Indicators/Data Elements): | No results |
| External ICD10 Documentation | |
This diagnosis is a part of ICD10 collection.
Additional Info
- The criteria for coding this are:
- Ca++ >= 3.3
- ionized Ca++ >=1.6
- Presence/absence of signs or symptoms are not part of the coding criterion, though they are:
- GI - anorexia, nausea\vomiting, constipation, abdominal pain, increased acid production (dyspepsia, PUD), pancreatitis
- Neuromuscular - weakness, proximal myopathy, decreased tone, decreased DTRs
- CNS - CNS depression ( lethargy, confusion * coma), ataxia, abnormal EEG, depression, psychosis
- Cardiovascular - hypertension, short QT interval, bradycardia, arrythmias
- Renal - nephrogenic D.I., calcium nephropathy (stones, nephrocalcinosis, azotemia)
- Miscellaneous - metastatic calcification
See https://ccmdb.kuality.ca/index.php?title=Hypocalcemia&curid=5880&diff=136294&oldid=125421
Serum corrected calcium is not reported. Instead if there is a concern for hyper/hypocalcemia an ionized calcium is now recommended.
Electrolyte disturbance
The paradigm for coding electrolyte disturbance diagnoses has 2 aspects, which could overlap:
- (1) Relatively extreme numerical thresholds for specific disturbances, to be coded without reference to presence or absence of symptoms. The threshold values are listed on the page for each of the specific ICD10 codes for electrolyte disturbances.
- (2) If a patient has symptomatic disturbance, the new rule is to code the disturbance(s) (e.g. Coma NOS, Rhabdomyolysis, Ventricular fibrillation), and link that diagnosis to Electrolyte disorder, NOS
| Log of previous electrolyte coding criteria |
|
Reverse chronological changes:
|
Repeated events
If this happens repeatedly during the same ward or unit stay, only code it the first time it happens, regardless of whether it is an Admit Diagnosis or Acquired Diagnosis, rather than each time it happens. See ICD10 codes only coded the first time for other diagnoses coded this way.
| Example: |
|
Alternate ICD10s to consider coding instead or in addition
- Hyperparathyroidism
- Parathyroid disorder, NOS
- Disorder of mineral metabolism, NOS
- Weight loss, abnormal
- Electrolyte disorder, NOS
Candidate Combined ICD10 codes
Log
- 2025-02-27 (item 4) - Changed from Ca++ > 3.5 OR any Ca++ > 2.55 AND in the presence of signs or symptoms believed to be due to hypercalcemia OR any Ca++ > 2.55 with active treatment for hypercalcemia
- 2024-03-04 - SH/DSM sent out a memo that serum corrected calcium will no longer be reported. Instead if there is a concern for hyper/hypocalcemia an ionized calcium is now recommended.
- 2018-02-12 (item 2) - decided to use thresholds as before ICD10
Related CCI Codes
Data Integrity Checks (automatic list)
none found
Related Articles
Show all ICD10 Subcategories