Check BRR/XBR vs cardiac arrest dx: Difference between revisions

From CCMDB Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
* [[Unwitnessed Cardiac Arrest]]  
* [[Unwitnessed Cardiac Arrest]]  
then there has to be a [[BRR]] collection entry.
then there has to be a [[BRR]] collection entry.
|DIC_related_concepts=[[Witnessed Cardiac Arrest]], [[Unwitnessed Cardiac Arrest]],  [[BRR]], [[Whole body cooling]], [[Cardiac arrest]]
|DIC_related_concepts=Witnessed Cardiac Arrest; Unwitnessed Cardiac Arrest; BRR; Whole body cooling; Cardiac arrest
|DIC_firmness=hard check
|DIC_firmness=hard check
|DIC_coding=query ''s_tmp_BRR_DX_inconsistent''
|DIC_coding=query ''s_tmp_BRR_DX_inconsistent''

Revision as of 20:42, 2018 October 26

Data Integrity Checks
Summary: If there is an Admit Diagnosis or Acquired Diagnosis of at least one of:

then there has to be a BRR collection entry.

Related: Witnessed Cardiac Arrest, Unwitnessed Cardiac Arrest, BRR, Whole body cooling, Cardiac arrest
Firmness: hard check
Timing: always
App: CCMDB.mdb
Coding: query s_tmp_BRR_DX_inconsistent
Uses L Problem table: not relevant for this app
Status: declined
Implementation Date: date change was rolled out / first applied
Backlogged: true
  • Cargo


  • SMW
"CCMDB.mdb" is not in the list (CCMDB.accdb, Centralized data front end.accdb, TISS28.accdb, SAP, DSM Labs Consistency check.accdb, not entered) of allowed values for the "DICApp" property. 
  • Categories:  
  • form:

CCI has code Whole body cooling for this. We will move our old tmp data into CCI for this. In order to migrate this check from the old codes to CCI we would need to have a "no cooling" entry which is, of course, not available in CCI. Allan confirmed with Bojan that our desire to cross-check this is not strong enough to add such a custom code, so we this cross check stops with the move to CCI.

Related articles

Related articles: