Allan's links: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 13:37, 10 January 2019

Allan offered to help us out with the ICD10 documentation. Here are a few links to get started.

Add to this by adding the following to the article:

{{Discuss | who = all, Allan, ... | question = 
* <put your concern here>}}

	Question	Modification date"Modification date" is a predefined property that corresponds to the date of the last modification of a subject and is provided by Semantic MediaWiki.	Last editor is"Last editor is" is a predefined property that contains the page name of the user who created the last revision and is provided by Semantic MediaWiki.
ABG Data	Identified as something we should do to streamline data collection. I have made this page to document progress toward this import. Blood gas data is in DSM listing; need to compare to see if we can use it Allan will revisit with Lab people whether this is obtainable now Ttenbergen 11:34, 2022 February 9 (CST) Allan is negotiating inclusion of Labs data with Grace hospital as per Task_Team_Meeting_-_Rolling_Agenda_and_Minutes_2023#ICU Database Task Group Meeting – April 19, 2023, leaving this flagged to ensure update. Ttenbergen 14:00, 2023 May 17 (CDT)	17 May 2023 19:00:40	Ttenbergen
APACHE Acute Dxs in ICD10 codes	You asked for a spot for this info	24 April 2024 18:20:04	Lisa Kaita
ICD10 Guideline MRSA	z "It was decided that Allan with contact Dr. Embil after COVID is over and see if we can obtain this data from Infection Control. If so, we could import it into the database, and have our data collectors cease obtaining it." - did anything come of that?	12 January 2021 20:59:00	Ttenbergen

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 Add to this by adding the following to the article: <pre>{{Discuss | who = all, Allan, ... | question =
 * <put your concern here>}}</pre>
-{{Discuss | who = all, Allan, ... | question =
-* This was a reminder to add the information that was discussed regarding linking different infections and their bugs to sepsis/severe sepsis and septic shock, even if blood cultures are negative. Also, our pre-ICD 10 coding would have identified positive blood cultures through the codes severe sepsis, septic shock, or septicemia, as we only coded the bacteria or yeast found in the blood culture with these codes (we would attach the "negative culture" to any septic shock or severe sepsis that had negative blood cultures, even if we had a positive culture from a different source ie. urine or wound swab). Should we now be adding the bacteremia code if we actually have a positive blood culture, so that it is clearly identified and extractable for research purposes, or are we not concerned about specifically tracking positive blood cultures?}}
 === Automatically generated list ===