2020-04 HSC COVID unit transition: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) →Background: How we code this will affect linking, we need to do it in a way that doesn't break Pagasa's processes when she gets back. |
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
== Background == | == Background == | ||
{Discuss |* Lisa asked - Patient x under A goes to A4 then becomes suspect and moves to D2 then becomes positive and moves to D4 but stays under A the whole time, do we make a new profile for each move? Or keep as one profile? | === Medicine specifics === | ||
{{Discuss |* Lisa asked - Patient x under A goes to A4 then becomes suspect and moves to D2 then becomes positive and moves to D4 but stays under A the whole time, do we make a new profile for each move? Or keep as one profile? | |||
* Julie wrote - We should have a cut-off date for the additional covid ward D2 and MS3. As I understand these new wards are for covid positives. Once dates are confirmed, then we start collecting at D2 and WS3. | * Julie wrote - We should have a cut-off date for the additional covid ward D2 and MS3. As I understand these new wards are for covid positives. Once dates are confirmed, then we start collecting at D2 and WS3. | ||
| Line 18: | Line 19: | ||
**** Should I remove D2 from service_location dropdown then? Or how will we use this? If we are not consistent about this we will have errors in linking, which needs to be able to match a dispo with a location and a location with a previous. Ttenbergen 20:40, 2020 April 14 (CDT)}} | **** Should I remove D2 from service_location dropdown then? Or how will we use this? If we are not consistent about this we will have errors in linking, which needs to be able to match a dispo with a location and a location with a previous. Ttenbergen 20:40, 2020 April 14 (CDT)}} | ||
=== ICU specifics === | |||
{{Discuss | Related to ICU, how will the patient originally at HSC_MICU then move to either H7 or A7 under the care of MICU be collected - will the move to H7/A7 be a new record or continuation?}} | {{Discuss | Related to ICU, how will the patient originally at HSC_MICU then move to either H7 or A7 under the care of MICU be collected - will the move to H7/A7 be a new record or continuation?}} | ||
| Line 43: | Line 45: | ||
* [[HSC_SICU]] | * [[HSC_SICU]] | ||
* [[HSC_IICU]] | * [[HSC_IICU]] | ||
{{Discuss | * | {{Discuss | | ||
Were there more? Pls add... Ttenbergen 20:29, 2020 April 14 (CDT) }} | * Were there more? Pls add... Ttenbergen 20:29, 2020 April 14 (CDT) }} | ||
== Service Locations == | == Service Locations == | ||
Revision as of 19:45, 14 April 2020
This page is about the April transition of collection units at HSC to accommodate the new COVID unit. See 2020-03 HSC COVID unit transition about earlier transitions in March.
Background
Medicine specifics
|
For Lisa's example, there can be 3 options assuming no official date yet for D2 as COVID positive ward : 1) A4, D2 together and new record D4 2) A4 one record, D4 new record – drop D2 (suspect only) because we don’t collect on that ward 3) A4 as one record and D2,D4 together as new record Which one? not sure, I have to think. Maybe option (2). If all the covid wards are operational, how to handle the case where the patient stayed in 2 official covid wards consecutively - 1) separate records or 2)one continuous record? I think we should consider (2) as continuous. Any thoughts?
|
ICU specifics
|
|
Related to ICU, how will the patient originally at HSC_MICU then move to either H7 or A7 under the care of MICU be collected - will the move to H7/A7 be a new record or continuation? |
The dates are not yet finalized
- Tuesday April 14.20 – patients in HSC_H4H (GH7 HOBS) will be moving to HSC_B2
- ?? April .20 - MS3 will be another new COVID-19 ward (HSC_MS3) with 29 adult beds
- ?? April .20 - D2 will be another new COVID-19 ward (HSC_D2_C) with 32 adult beds
- ?? .20 - H7 (H7 and H733 old CCU) will be additional 17 beds for ICU (HSC_MICU and/or HSC_SICU)
- it is not yet clear if this ward is allocated for MICU only or SICU only or both - waiting for the decision.
- ?? .20 - A7 will be additional 14 beds for ICU (HSC_MICU and/or HSC_SICU)
- it is not yet clear if this ward is allocated for MICU only or SICU only or both - waiting for the decision.
Wards involved:
originals:
|
|
|
Service Locations
Tmp entries
|
|
Do we need any? |
Transition plan
- There is no transition plan for the new COVID wards and the additional ICUs. Just need to add in the s_dispo table
- This transition plan is only for the patients in H4H who were moved to HSC_B2
- "HSC_H4H" needs to be added to s_tmp of Project BoardingLoc
collector instructions
- change the Service/Location of the record to the new location (ie from HSC_H4H to HSC_B2 )
- Multi DC are collecting the H4H patients
- HSC_H4H_a to HSC_B2
- HSC_H4H_b to HSC_B2
- HSC_H4H_d to HSC_B2
- HSC_H4H_h to HSC_B2
- the new ward B2 does not need a subscript anymore because the Laptop identifier replaces it.
- Multi DC are collecting the H4H patients
- enter the actual location as part of Boarding Loc:
- for patients who had no location borrowing during transition:
- change the "no borrow" line to "HSC_H4H" and enter the time the patient arrived in H4H
- add a line for "HSC - Home medicine ward" with the time that the patient was actually moved
- if there were patients who actually were in a borrow location during the transition, let's talk about how we would enter those
- for patients who had no location borrowing during transition:
data processor instructions
|
|
Depending on how we do this with tmp vs service location we may end up with linking issues and orphans; need to review. |
Reporting
- service location HSC_H4H before April 14,2020 and HSC_B2 can be together.
- all COVID wards namely HSC_D4_C, HSC_D2_C, HSC_MS3 can be together.
- HSC_MICU, HSC_A7_MI, HSC_H7_MI can be together.
- HSC_SICU, HSC_A7_SI, HSC_H7_SI can be together.
Cross checks
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related articles
| Related articles: |