2020 GRA COVID unit transition: Difference between revisions

Line 17:

* A couple weeks ago I had I believe 2 random surgery patients that were admitted to 5N. I entered them what I thought was in error, I talked with Pagasa and the profiles were deleted and a valid gap was made for those serial numbers. I believe they were on 5N because they were swabbed for COVID. Do we care about tracking cases like this? Because to be honest, if we see a surgery service patient on our EPR reports, we don’t view it (unless of course they’re a long recovery and need to be moved to medicine for PT/OT, etc). Surgery patients admitted under surgeons don’t get viewed by us. Surgery patients admitted under our regular medicine docs will get viewed.

}}

=== Random bits from crazy email stream, need to be integrated ===

'''Collection'''

* COVID SUS on 3S as well but under a 3S doctor, not a 2S/5N doctor

** use [[GRA S3]] profile and [[Boarding Loc]]=GRA_N5

* We want all COVID POS to be labeled with service location of [[GRA_5S_C]] regardless of their physical location ([[GRA N5]] or ''GRA_5S'')

* [[GRA N5]] is a mixed of [[GRA S3]] and [[GRA N3]] too. So these will be entered in S3 or N3, also with tmp [[Boarding Loc]] = GRA_N5

'''Transition'''

* Those who remain in N5 (suspects or non-covid) before '''April 15''' who did not move to 2S or who did not become COVID+ will remain [[GRA_N5]] profile.

* All N5 admitted on or after April 15 will have [[GRA 2S]] profile.

=== Earlier content ===

Line 50:

Line 61:

#**Are there new patients admitted at N5 (primarily as COVID suspects)? --[[User:JMojica|JMojica]] 16:01, 2020 April 14 (CDT)

#***On closer inspection the new people being admitted to this ward are all Covid suspects, was hard to tell at first because patients that stayed on this ward were 5 North patients. So it looks like the new patients on the ward are boarders[[User:Mcrawley|Mcrawley]] 08:01, 2020 April 15 (CDT)

=== Transition plan ===

@@ Line 17: / Line 17: @@
 *  A couple weeks ago I had I believe 2 random surgery patients that were admitted to 5N. I entered them what I thought was in error, I talked with Pagasa and the profiles were deleted and a valid gap was made for those serial numbers. I believe they were on 5N because they were swabbed for COVID. Do we care about tracking cases like this? Because to be honest, if we see a surgery service patient on our EPR reports, we don’t view it (unless of course they’re a long recovery and need to be moved to medicine for PT/OT, etc). Surgery patients admitted under surgeons don’t get viewed by us. Surgery patients admitted under our regular medicine docs will get viewed.
 }}
+=== Random bits from crazy email stream, need to be integrated ===
+'''Collection'''
+* COVID SUS on 3S as well but under a 3S doctor, not a 2S/5N doctor
+** use [[GRA S3]] profile and [[Boarding Loc]]=GRA_N5
+* We want all COVID POS to be labeled with service location of [[GRA_5S_C]] regardless of their physical location ([[GRA N5]] or ''GRA_5S'')
+* [[GRA N5]] is a mixed of [[GRA S3]] and [[GRA N3]] too.  So these will be entered in S3 or N3, also  with tmp [[Boarding Loc]] = GRA_N5
+'''Transition'''
+* Those who remain  in N5 (suspects or non-covid) before '''April 15''' who did not move to 2S or who did not  become COVID+  will remain [[GRA_N5]] profile.
+* All N5 admitted on or after April 15 will have [[GRA 2S]] profile.
 === Earlier content ===
@@ Line 50: / Line 61: @@
 #**Are there new patients admitted at N5 (primarily as COVID suspects)? --[[User:JMojica|JMojica]] 16:01, 2020 April 14 (CDT)
 #***On closer inspection the new people being admitted to this ward are all Covid suspects, was hard to tell at first because patients that stayed on this ward were 5 North patients. So it looks like the new patients on the ward are boarders[[User:Mcrawley|Mcrawley]] 08:01, 2020 April 15 (CDT)
 === Transition plan ===