Swap Locations: Difference between revisions
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
The use of swap or swing locations makes it hard to follow patients in [[Cognos Report Integrator]], so we need to find out more about how these are used. | The use of swap or swing locations makes it hard to follow patients in [[Cognos Report Integrator]], so we need to find out more about how these are used. | ||
=== possible solution: list all bed dttms instead of all unit dttms === | |||
If we listed all bed dttms instead of all unit dttms the collectors would be able to pick the actual physical move dttms from that and exclude any irrelevant bed moves (eg during an admission). This would increase the noise collectors need to wade through. We would ''not'' be able to just exclude the swap locations from such a list because that would result in a gap between the previous location and the next, and gaps should at least be transparent (ie you can see why they are there). | |||
I think this would show the collector all the info they need to make their admit decisions. It would create more frequent listings in [[CUS]] (i.e. one for each bed move). It would also require more columns in the unit section of [[Patient Viewer Tab Cognos ADT2]] since bed name and bed start and end dttm would also need to be listed. | |||
{{Discuss | | |||
* Collectors: Do you think this would work? | |||
}} | |||
=== possible solution: exclude by filter === | === possible solution: exclude by filter === | ||