Past history, cancer (any type), believed cured: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
|||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
== Additional Info == | == Additional Info == | ||
*To indicate a (presumably) cured | *To indicate a (presumably) cured malignancy, use this code COMBINED with the code for the specific cancer. | ||
*If in addition, the (presumably) cured malignancy included mets, then ALSO combine with the code for the site(s) of mets, e.g. [[Lymph nodes, metastatic malignancy to them (also code primary site)]] | |||
{{Discuss | who = Allan | question = this used to say: "Use this code, '''and only this code''', to code a cancer believed cured. I.e. do not also code the kind of cancer it was, i.e. '''do not enter [[Combined ICD10 codes]] for the actual type of cancer the person had'''. The reason is that data analysis would not necessarily catch the fact that the cancer code is not an active one", but are we SURE we want this rule? Doesn't it make more sense to combine this code with the type of cancer to indicate an old and cured cancer?}} | {{Discuss | who = Allan | question = this used to say: "Use this code, '''and only this code''', to code a cancer believed cured. I.e. do not also code the kind of cancer it was, i.e. '''do not enter [[Combined ICD10 codes]] for the actual type of cancer the person had'''. The reason is that data analysis would not necessarily catch the fact that the cancer code is not an active one", but are we SURE we want this rule? Doesn't it make more sense to combine this code with the type of cancer to indicate an old and cured cancer?}} |
Revision as of 12:23, 2019 September 12
ICD10 Diagnosis | |
Dx: | Past history, cancer (any type), believed cured |
ICD10 code: | Z85 |
Pre-ICD10 counterpart: | none assigned |
Charlson/ALERT Scale: | none |
APACHE Como Component: | none |
APACHE Acute Component: | none |
Start Date: | |
Stop Date: | |
External ICD10 Documentation |
This diagnosis is a part of ICD10 collection.
Additional Info
- To indicate a (presumably) cured malignancy, use this code COMBINED with the code for the specific cancer.
- If in addition, the (presumably) cured malignancy included mets, then ALSO combine with the code for the site(s) of mets, e.g. Lymph nodes, metastatic malignancy to them (also code primary site)
this used to say: "Use this code, and only this code, to code a cancer believed cured. I.e. do not also code the kind of cancer it was, i.e. do not enter Combined ICD10 codes for the actual type of cancer the person had. The reason is that data analysis would not necessarily catch the fact that the cancer code is not an active one", but are we SURE we want this rule? Doesn't it make more sense to combine this code with the type of cancer to indicate an old and cured cancer? |
Alternate ICD10s to consider coding instead or in addition
Candidate Combined ICD10 codes
Related CCI Codes
Data Integrity Checks (automatic list)
none found
Related Articles
Show all ICD10 Subcategories