Update of D ID exclude service/location: Difference between revisions

mNo edit summary
m Text replacement - "[[Orphans in Centralized_data.accdb]]" to "Orphans in Centralized_data.accdb"
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 7: Line 7:
== Background ==
== Background ==
=== Rationale for doing this ===
=== Rationale for doing this ===
At some point, including the [[Service/Location]] in [[D_ID]] was the biggest cause of [[Orphans in Centralized data.mdb]], and required special processes such as [[Changing D IDs]]. With everyone now entering fewer profiles and fewer [[Service Location]]s due to [[PatientFollow Project]], there should be much fewer problems caused by this, so this change is likely not worth the effort.  
At some point, including the [[Service/Location]] in [[D_ID]] was the biggest cause of [[Orphans in Centralized_data.accdb]], and required special processes such as [[Changing D IDs]]. With everyone now entering fewer profiles and fewer [[Service Location]]s due to [[PatientFollow Project]], there should be much fewer problems caused by this, so this change is likely not worth the effort.  


==== Rationale for ''not'' doing this ====
==== Rationale for ''not'' doing this ====
Line 27: Line 27:
We have updated the [[Sending_Patients#What_happens_when_patients_are_sent|send functionality]] for this.  
We have updated the [[Sending_Patients#What_happens_when_patients_are_sent|send functionality]] for this.  


We will either need to make the change contingent on start_date field or there will be [[Orphans in Centralized data.mdb]] to clean up.  
We will either need to make the change contingent on start_date field or there will be [[Orphans in Centralized_data.accdb]]to clean up.  


Some steps required:  
Some steps required:  
Line 47: Line 47:


The Tiss import process will need to be updated to use the new D_ID format based on start_date field. If this is done successfully, I '''''think''''' no further process change would be necessary.
The Tiss import process will need to be updated to use the new D_ID format based on start_date field. If this is done successfully, I '''''think''''' no further process change would be necessary.
{{Discuss|
* can someone else think of how this might not work out right? }}


== Related articles ==  
== Related articles ==