Query NDC Pacemaker acquired vs TISS: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
|DIC_implementation_date=2019/01/06 | |DIC_implementation_date=2019/01/06 | ||
|DIC_status=retired | |DIC_status=retired | ||
|DIC_LProblem= | |DIC_LProblem=no | ||
|DIC_app=Centralized data front end.accdb | |DIC_app=Centralized data front end.accdb | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 13:52, 22 July 2025
Legacy Content
This page contains Legacy Content.
- Explanation: see #log
- Successor: No successor was entered
Click Expand to show legacy content.
| Data Integrity Checks | |
| Summary: | Records with Acquired Procedure of Pacemaker insertion, temporary that don't have date-matching Pacemaker insertion or vice versa. |
| Related: | Pacemaker insertion, permanent, Pacemaker insertion, temporary, Permanent Pacemaker Insertion, Pacemaker insertion (TISS Item) |
| Firmness: | hard check |
| Timing: | complete |
| App: | Centralized data front end.accdb |
| Coding: | query NDC_Pacemaker_TISS_vs_acquired |
| Uses L Problem table: | no |
| Status: | retired |
| Implementation Date: | 2019/01/06 |
| Backlogged: | true |
This query includes incomplete patients; the Data Processor only checks into incompletes during reporting time.
Log
- 2021-10-07 - query deleted
- 2020-10-01 - collection of Pacemaker insertion (TISS Item) stopped as part of Change to collect TISS data in CCI Picklist, so the check would have no longer worked
Related articles
| Related articles: |