Fungemia, NOS: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) m (Text replacement - "[[Bacteremia, NOS" to "[[Bacteremia") |
||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
*[[Severe sepsis]] | *[[Severe sepsis]] | ||
*Any infection that is the source of this fungemia. | *Any infection that is the source of this fungemia. | ||
*[[Bacteremia | *[[Bacteremia]] | ||
== Candidate [[Combined ICD10 codes]] == | == Candidate [[Combined ICD10 codes]] == |
Revision as of 14:08, 2018 April 4
ICD10 Diagnosis | |
Dx: | Fungemia, NOS |
ICD10 code: | B49 |
Pre-ICD10 counterpart: | OTHER -Fungus |
Charlson/ALERT Scale: | none |
APACHE Como Component: | none |
APACHE Acute Component: | none |
Start Date: | |
Stop Date: | |
External ICD10 Documentation |
This diagnosis is a part of ICD10 collection.
Additional Info
- Fungemia is a lab finding, not a disease. Following our general rule, code symptoms, signs and diagnostic abnormalities when the underlying CAUSE is unknown. If that cause is known, then of course you must code it, and coding the abnormal finding is optional.
- So, if the patient has a known infection AND/OR Severe sepsis OR Shock, septic you MUST code those.
Template:ICD10 Symptoms not needed when cause known
Alternate ICD10s to consider coding instead or in addition
- Shock, septic
- Severe sepsis
- Any infection that is the source of this fungemia.
- Bacteremia
Candidate Combined ICD10 codes
- Code the organism. Template:ICD10 If you knew the organism then why would it be coded as NOS in the first place? Ttenbergen 23:22, 2017 November 17 (CST)
- Others, as mentioned above.
Related CCI Codes
Related Articles
Show all ICD10 Subcategories