LAU collection readmission data: Difference between revisions
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
=== Data Entry Instructions === | === Data Entry Instructions === | ||
Follow the definition in [[Readmission to MedWard]]. If you find that either this admission is a re-admission, or that there is a re-admission following this admission, enter one of the following. | |||
* '''Project: LAU Readm''' - Item: "has previous" - Date/Time: that admission's dispo_dttm | * '''Project: LAU Readm''' - Item: "has previous" - Date/Time: that admission's dispo_dttm | ||
* '''Project: LAU Readm''' - Item: "has later" - Date/Time: that admission's service start_dttm | * '''Project: LAU Readm''' - Item: "has later" - Date/Time: that admission's service start_dttm | ||
* Checkbox, Integer, Real, Comment: not used | * Checkbox, Integer, Real, Comment: not used | ||
Enter this even if the partner-record is also part of the [[LAU Collection Project]]; yes, we would be able to find that re-admission in our usual way, but having all the data coded the same way will make it more consistent to analyze. | |||
{{DT| | {{DT| | ||
* If the first admission and the readmission are part of our current review?, do we still enter the tmp project? or will you connect the two admissions when analyzing the data? [[User:Lkaita|Lisa Kaita]] 19:07, 4 March 2025 (CST) | * If the first admission and the readmission are part of our current review?, do we still enter the tmp project? or will you connect the two admissions when analyzing the data? [[User:Lkaita|Lisa Kaita]] 19:07, 4 March 2025 (CST) | ||
** I think we should, that way the stats are more straightfwd for this. But we may want to know more about what the other admission was. Do we want to have more items, such as "previous med" or "later ICU"? [[Readmission to MedWard]] says "Readmission is attributed to the site or hospital from which the patient was discharged. "; so we would not need details for the future site, but might want them for the previous, even if we only did as little as "same" and "other". [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 19:00, 5 March 2025 (CST) | ** I think we should, that way the stats are more straightfwd for this. But we may want to know more about what the other admission was. Do we want to have more items, such as "previous med" or "later ICU"? [[Readmission to MedWard]] says "Readmission is attributed to the site or hospital from which the patient was discharged. "; so we would not need details for the future site, but might want them for the previous, even if we only did as little as "same" and "other". I started to add this above, if I got it right then pls delete this comment. [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 19:00, 5 March 2025 (CST) | ||
* do we include readmission if the previous admission was ICU? [[User:Lkaita|Lisa Kaita]] 11:39, 5 March 2025 (CST) | * do we include readmission if the previous admission was ICU? [[User:Lkaita|Lisa Kaita]] 11:39, 5 March 2025 (CST) | ||
** [[Readmission to MedWard]] only considers it a re-admission if they left the hospital setting in between. Is that what you mean here, that they were in an ICU, went home and then came to LAU? [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 19:00, 5 March 2025 (CST) }} | ** [[Readmission to MedWard]] only considers it a re-admission if they left the hospital setting in between. Is that what you mean here, that they were in an ICU, went home and then came to LAU? [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 19:00, 5 March 2025 (CST) }} | ||
==== Sources ==== | ==== Sources ==== | ||
* History and physical | * History and physical |
Revision as of 23:34, 5 March 2025
Projects | |
Active?: | planned |
Program: | |
Requestor: | Dr. Dan Roberts |
Collection start: | TBA "TBA" contains an extrinsic dash or other characters that are invalid for a date interpretation. |
Collection end: | TBA "TBA" contains an extrinsic dash or other characters that are invalid for a date interpretation. |
This dataset contains data in support of the LAU Collection Project.
It is used to store data analogous to Readmission to MedWard. For the usual medicine program collection we don't need to store this explicitly because we derive it from future or past records. The sample size for LAU Collection Project is too short to do it that way reliably, so we will store the data explicitly.
Data Collection
- For any record collected as part of LAU Collection Project, consider whether there is an indication of a previous admission for which this is a re-admission, or a subsequent admission that is a re-admission for this admission.
- To decide if something is a re-admission, follow the criteria in Readmission to MedWard
Data Entry Instructions
Follow the definition in Readmission to MedWard. If you find that either this admission is a re-admission, or that there is a re-admission following this admission, enter one of the following.
- Project: LAU Readm - Item: "has previous" - Date/Time: that admission's dispo_dttm
- Project: LAU Readm - Item: "has later" - Date/Time: that admission's service start_dttm
- Checkbox, Integer, Real, Comment: not used
Enter this even if the partner-record is also part of the LAU Collection Project; yes, we would be able to find that re-admission in our usual way, but having all the data coded the same way will make it more consistent to analyze.
![]() |
|
Sources
- History and physical
- EPR ER documents
- Progress notes in chart
- EPR Patient information tab, visit history will list previous inpt admissions from within the city and some facilities outside the city
Data Use
This data is being collected as a current state for LAU Collection Project.
Consistency Checks
Data Integrity Checks (automatic list)
App | Status | |
---|---|---|
Query check LAU collection readmission data | CCMDB.accdb | implemented |
Related articles
Related articles: |