Check pre acute consistent: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) m Text replacement - "[[Category: " to "[[Category:" |
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
}} | }} | ||
Discussed with Julie; she used to use this as part of Overstay, but that project is no longer so we don't need this. | Discussed with Julie; she used to use this as part of Overstay, but that project is no longer so we don't need this. | ||
{{Discuss | JALT | |||
* Julie found data discrepancies and asked if we could review doing cross checks at least on records with the same [[Visit Admit DtTm]] for the following fields: | |||
** [[Pre acute living situation]] | |||
** [[Province field]] | |||
** [[Postal Code]] | |||
* We reviewed a broader cross check proposal [https://ccmdb.kuality.ca/index.php?title=Check_pre_acute_consistent&oldid=138792 in some detail in a version available in the history of this page], so if we consider adding this we should confirm that none of those apply to any checks. Or we can ignore and just implement as soft-checks. Thoughts? [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 12:28, 17 December 2025 (CST) | |||
}} | |||
== Related articles == | == Related articles == | ||
Revision as of 12:28, 17 December 2025
| Data Integrity Checks | |
| Summary: | consistency of Pre acute living situation; Dispo; Postal Code and Previous Location |
| Related: | Pre acute living situation, Dispo, Postal Code, Previous Location, Province field |
| Firmness: | soft check |
| Timing: | complete |
| App: | CCMDB.accdb |
| Coding: | query check pre acute consistent |
| Uses L Problem table: | not relevant for this app |
| Status: | declined |
| Implementation Date: | not entered |
| Backlogged: | No |
Discussed with Julie; she used to use this as part of Overstay, but that project is no longer so we don't need this.
|
|
Related articles
| Related articles: |