Check pre acute consistent: Difference between revisions

From CCMDB Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
 
(20 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Data Integrity Check
{{Data Integrity Check
| DIC_summary = consistency of [[Pre acute living situation]], [[Dispo]], [[Postal Code]] and [[Previous Location]]
|DIC_summary=consistency of Pre acute living situationDispo[[Postal Code]] and [[Previous Location]]
| DIC_related_concepts = [[Pre acute living situation]], [[Dispo]], [[Postal Code]], [[Previous Location]]
|DIC_related_concepts=Pre acute living situationDispoPostal Code; Previous Location
| DIC_firmness = soft check  
|DIC_firmness=soft check
| DIC_timing = complete
|DIC_timing=complete
| DIC_app = CCMDB.mdb
|DIC_coding=query '''check pre acute consistent'''
| DIC_coding = query '''check pre acute consistent'''  
|DIC_status=declined
| DIC_status = needs review
|DIC_app=CCMDB.accdb
| DIC_implementation_date =  
|DIC_backlogged=No
}}
}}
 
Discussed with Julie; she used to use this as part of Overstay, but that project is no longer so we don't need this.  
The collector will receive an escapable warning if:
* {{Discuss | who = Julie | what exactly do we want to check for? Please also have a look at the stuff below that doesn't specifically have your name. This requested check ties into a bunch of things and if we want the check we need to be sure that instructions stay consistent and lose ends are tied up.}}
 
== Remaining questions ==
{{Discussion}} There was a previous attempt to address some of this in [[Care levels in the community]]; this page and it need to be consistent, and consistently linked from the relevant field definitions. If we can get it short enough we might make a template to apply the instructions to each of the field pages.
 
{{Discussion}} There are instructions relating to some of the pages in [[:Category:Awaiting/delayed transfer]], consistency with this page needs to be confirmed.
 
{{Discussion}} How does [[Chronic Health Facility]] fit into this?
 
{{Discussion}} There was talk about compating [[Postal Code]]s to known PCH Postal Codes. Since these might include other buildings at the same site that are not PCHs, this check can at best be a soft check. Please add the list of these postal codes here.
 
=== Background ===
Julie found cases where the [[pre acute living situation]] for direct admits are not consistent with [[Previous Location]] and/or [[Dispo]].  We want the DC to be aware that the [[pre acute living situation]] has a relationship with the [[Previous Location]] or [[Dispo]]specifically for [[PCH]] cases. 
 
Examples:
* [[pre acute living situation]] = assisted living;    [[Previous Location]] = Winnipeg PCH
* [[pre acute living situation]] = supportive home;  [[Previous Location]] = St Amant
 
I rely on the combination of [[pre acute living situation]], [[Previous Location]], [[Postal Code]] and [[Dispo]] fields '''to identified new or already PCH residents''' prior to admission. Data collectors must understand that '''[[Assisted Living]] and [[Supportive Housing]] are not [[PCH]] and must be entered as simply HOME''' as confirmed by Dr Roberts.
 
As per email from Julie:
<pre>
I have asked Pagasa to audit some records where the postal code matches with the PCH Facility.  In most of these cases, Pagasa found that EPR addresses (no and street) match with the PCH facility’s addresses but the Pre-acute living situation =’Apartment’  instead of ‘Personal Care Home’ .  this is possible because the address has the same format  ‘Suite# - No and Street Name’ . 
 
PCH resident data prior to admission is not only being used in Medicine but also needed  in Critical Care.
 
Tina, is it possible to ask at entry level,  say, – the postal code matches with a PCH facility (show the PCH address) but the pre-living situation entered is not ‘Personal Care Home’ , is this correct?    I suppose DCs are getting the postal code from EPR where the exact address is also visible.  
</pre>


== Related articles ==
== Related articles ==
Line 45: Line 16:
[[Category: Admit/Discharge]]
[[Category: Admit/Discharge]]
[[Category: Registry Data]]
[[Category: Registry Data]]
[[Category: Postal Codes]
[[Category: Postal Codes]]
[[Category: Pre-acute living situation]]
[[Category: Pre-acute living situation]]

Latest revision as of 09:48, 2022 April 14

Data Integrity Checks
Summary: consistency of Pre acute living situation; Dispo; Postal Code and Previous Location
Related: Pre acute living situation, Dispo, Postal Code, Previous Location
Firmness: soft check
Timing: complete
App: CCMDB.accdb
Coding: query check pre acute consistent
Uses L Problem table: not relevant for this app
Status: declined
Implementation Date: not entered
Backlogged: No
  • Cargo


  • SMW


  • Categories: 
  • form:

Discussed with Julie; she used to use this as part of Overstay, but that project is no longer so we don't need this.

Related articles

Related articles: